Winton HRC 9 April 2017 – R 11 – Chair, Mr P Knowles
ID: JCA15820
Meet Title:
Winton HRC - 9 April 2017
Meet Chair:
PKnowles
Meet Committee Member 1:
GHall
Race Date:
2017/04/09
Race Number:
Winton HRC 9 April 2017 - R 5 - Chair, Mr P Knowles
Decision:
We find the charge proved.
Penalty:
Facts:
Rules 869 (4) (6) (b) and (c) state:
869 (4): No horseman shall during any race do anything which interferes or is likely to interfere with his own horse and/or any other horse or its progress.
869 (6): Subject to sub-rule (4) hereof:-
(b) a horse making a forward movement during any race shall not be forced to race wider on the track.
(c) a horse during a race shall not move ground outwards once the nose of the wider runner coming forward is in line with or past its sulky wheel and until the wider runner going forward is fully past.
Submissions for Decision:
Mr Boyd, with the assistance of the videos, identified the relevant positions of Mr Lee, Mr Hunter and Mr Barclay. Mr Lee was four-back on the pole line as the field entered the home straight with over a lap to run. He said Mr Lee shifted outwards just after the finish line and in doing so forced Mr Hunter (Rakarover) wider on the track. This outwards shift also forced Mr Barclay (Dali Bread) to race wider.
Mr Wallis stated that Mr Hunter was in the one-out position and behind the sulky wheel of Magnate Mara at the top of the straight. He stated Mr Lee had every opportunity (over 200m) with which to move out, but left his outwards movement too late forcing both Rakarover and Dali Bread to race three and four-wide respectively entering the bend. He said both Mr Hunter and Mr Barclay were improving forward when Mr Lee opted to shift outwards.
Mr Wallis called Mr Hunter to give evidence. Mr Hunter stated about 150m prior to the incident he gave Mr Lee an option to come out as he was outside his wheel and not moving forward. He had waited for Mr Lee and nothing happened. Just after the finish line Mr Lee shifted outwards but by that time Mr Barclay was improving forward on his outside and he was forced to race three-wide.
Mr Lee stated he had every intention of coming out ahead of Mr Hunter. However, his horse was racing greenly and when he went to shift outwards the horse was slow to respond. He believed he was always in a position to shift outwards and Mr Hunter’s horse moved forward after he shifted out. He thought Mr Hunter would have made a better effort to shift forwards and felt it was circumstances more than anything.
In summary Mr Wallis stated Mr Lee had had every opportunity over a considerable distance to shift outwards but had left his outwards movement too late. In doing so, both Mr Hunter and Barclay were forced wider on the track. Mr Lee said Mr Hunter gave him an opportunity to come out and he did so. He felt there were other circumstances involved.
Reasons for Decision:
Submissions for Penalty:
Mr Lee submitted a fine at the lower end would be appreciated.
Reasons for Penalty:
JCA Decision Fields (raw)
Dmitry: This section contains all JCA fields migrated from the raw data.
Data from these fields should be mapped appropriately to display amongst the standard fields above; please make note of any values below that are missing in the above standard fields but should be there.
hearingid: d700b2e3467c2f89f24a143a8e57c49b
informantnumber: A9011
horsename:
hearing_racingtype:
startdate: no date provided
newcharge: Interference
plea: denied
penaltyrequired: 1
decisiondate: 12/04/2017
hearing_title: Winton HRC 9 April 2017 - R 11 - Chair, Mr P Knowles
charge:
facts:
Rules 869 (4) (6) (b) and (c) state:
869 (4): No horseman shall during any race do anything which interferes or is likely to interfere with his own horse and/or any other horse or its progress.
869 (6): Subject to sub-rule (4) hereof:-
(b) a horse making a forward movement during any race shall not be forced to race wider on the track.
(c) a horse during a race shall not move ground outwards once the nose of the wider runner coming forward is in line with or past its sulky wheel and until the wider runner going forward is fully past.
appealdecision:
isappeal:
submissionsfordecision:
Mr Boyd, with the assistance of the videos, identified the relevant positions of Mr Lee, Mr Hunter and Mr Barclay. Mr Lee was four-back on the pole line as the field entered the home straight with over a lap to run. He said Mr Lee shifted outwards just after the finish line and in doing so forced Mr Hunter (Rakarover) wider on the track. This outwards shift also forced Mr Barclay (Dali Bread) to race wider.
Mr Wallis stated that Mr Hunter was in the one-out position and behind the sulky wheel of Magnate Mara at the top of the straight. He stated Mr Lee had every opportunity (over 200m) with which to move out, but left his outwards movement too late forcing both Rakarover and Dali Bread to race three and four-wide respectively entering the bend. He said both Mr Hunter and Mr Barclay were improving forward when Mr Lee opted to shift outwards.
Mr Wallis called Mr Hunter to give evidence. Mr Hunter stated about 150m prior to the incident he gave Mr Lee an option to come out as he was outside his wheel and not moving forward. He had waited for Mr Lee and nothing happened. Just after the finish line Mr Lee shifted outwards but by that time Mr Barclay was improving forward on his outside and he was forced to race three-wide.
Mr Lee stated he had every intention of coming out ahead of Mr Hunter. However, his horse was racing greenly and when he went to shift outwards the horse was slow to respond. He believed he was always in a position to shift outwards and Mr Hunter’s horse moved forward after he shifted out. He thought Mr Hunter would have made a better effort to shift forwards and felt it was circumstances more than anything.
In summary Mr Wallis stated Mr Lee had had every opportunity over a considerable distance to shift outwards but had left his outwards movement too late. In doing so, both Mr Hunter and Barclay were forced wider on the track. Mr Lee said Mr Hunter gave him an opportunity to come out and he did so. He felt there were other circumstances involved.
reasonsfordecision:
Decision:
We find the charge proved.
sumissionsforpenalty:
Mr Lee submitted a fine at the lower end would be appreciated.
reasonsforpenalty:
penalty:
hearing_type: Hearing
Rules: 869(4)(6)(b) and (c)
Informant: Mr S Wallis - Stipendiary Steward
JockeysandTrainer: Mr G Lee - Open Horseman
Otherperson: Mr P Hunter - Open Horseman, Mr C Boyd - Stipendiary Steward
PersonPresent:
Respondent:
StipendSteward:
raceid: 138b8a35aef2315497a3681658e7e7ba
race_expapproval:
racecancelled: 0
race_noreport: 0
race_emailed1: 0
race_emailed2: 0
race_title: Winton HRC 9 April 2017 - R 5 - Chair, Mr P Knowles
submittochair:
race_expappcomment:
race_km:
race_otherexp:
race_chair:
race_pm1:
race_pm2:
meetid: 8bbc96b1871f112ef1e4259e5d8b2330
meet_expapproval:
meet_noreport: 0
waitingforpublication: 1
meet_emailed1: 0
meet_emailed2: 0
meetdate: 09/04/2017
meet_title: Winton HRC - 9 April 2017
meet_expappcomment:
meet_km:
meet_otherexp:
tracklocation: winton-hrc
meet_racingtype: harness-racing
meet_chair: PKnowles
meet_pm1: GHall
meet_pm2: none
name: Winton HRC