Archive Decision

This decision has been migrated from the JCA website. Information is accurate but formatting may differ from contemporary decisions. Please contact us for any further enquiries.

N Z Metro 12 November 2010 – R 5

ID: JCA14769

Applicant:
Mrs K Williams, Stipendiary Steward

Respondent(s):
Mr R May, Licensed Open Driver

Information Number:
69329

Hearing Type:
Hearing

Rules:
869(7A)(a) and (b)

Plea:
admitted

Meet Title:
NZ Metro TC - 12 November 2010

Meet Chair:
RMcKenzie

Meet Committee Member 1:
JPhelan

Race Date:
2010/11/12

Race Number:
R 5

Decision:

The charge was found proved.

Penalty:

Mr May was fined the sum of $200.

Charge:

Struck and moved inside marker line

Facts:

Following the running of Race 5, The Marque Hotel Christchurch Graduation Series (Final) Mobile Pace, an information was filed by Stipendiary Steward, Mrs K R Williams, against Licensed Open Driver, Mr R T May, alleging a breach of Rule 869 (7A) (a) & (b) in that Mr May, as the driver of WAIPAWA JUNIOR in the race, “struck and shifted inside the track marker line in the run home”.
 
Mr May was present at the hearing of the information and he indicated that he did not admit the breach.
 
Rule 869 provides as follows:
(7A) Every horseman who moves inwards shall ensure:
(a)         that contact is not made with any track marker
(b)         that any part of the sulky does not protrude inside the marker line.
 
It shall be a defence to a breach of this sub-rule if the horseman establishes that the breach was attributable to the behaviour of his own horse or any other horseman in the race.

 

Submissions for Decision:

Mrs Williams pointed out to the Committee that WAIPAWA JUNIOR had been disqualified from the race at an earlier protest hearing pursuant to Rule 869 (7B). At that protest hearing, the trainer of the horse, Mr G R Dunn, had not contested the protest.
 
Mrs Williams showed video replays of the run home. She pointed out Mr May, driving WAIPAWA JUNIOR, racing 3-back on the markers turning for home. He then shifted into the passing lane, striking one marker, going inside a second marker and coming out just before the third marker. Mrs Williams said that the horse did “head in there” but Mr May continued to use the whip and reins and activated the removable hood. She submitted that Mr May had a “lack of control” of the horse which allowed it to shift inside the marker line, without being steered in there.
 
Mr May said that the horse was having its second raceday start and the race had been run in a very fast time of 3-11.6 for the mobile 2600 metres. When he pulled the horse in, he did not realise that he was “in that far”. The horse had shied away from the cart in front, which was a wide cart. Mr May said that, although the horse had lost 5th placing, he had not affected any other runner. He also stated that the horse had been distracted by several track markers dislodged by a runner in front. There was room for the horse in the early stages of the passing lane although it did get tight at a later stage of the run home, he said.

 

Reasons for Decision:

The Committee found that Mr May did angle WAIPAWA JUNIOR into the passing lane after being 3-back on the markers turning for home. From that point, the horse’s sulky wheel struck one track marker and ran inside another. Mr May did not dispute this.
 
The Committee further found that Mr May did not take sufficient steps to ensure that the horse did not go inside the track marker line. The Committee noted Mr May’s submissions as to the horse’s inexperience, the fast time and the other matters he referred to. In the Committee’s view, these were contributing factors at best. Further, it was not a defence for Mr May to say that he did not realise how far inside the marker line he had gone.
 
The Committee was not satisfied that Mr May took all reasonable or possible steps to prevent the horse going inside the track marker line.

 

Submissions for Penalty:

Mrs Williams said that the race was a $15,000 Graduation Series final. She submitted that the usual fine for a breach of the Rule is $200. In this case, she submitted that the fine should be between $200-300 because of the class of race. Mr May had no previous breaches of the Rule. Mrs Williams acknowledged that the present breach was less serious than a case where a driver goes inside the markers to gain a run to which he is not entitled. In this case, it was a simple lack of attention.
 
Mr May submitted that the breach was a minor one.
 

Reasons for Penalty:

The Committee in determining penalty took into account Mr May’s previous good record and that the breach was at the lower end of a scale of seriousness. It also took into account that the horse’s inexperience may have been a contributing factor. The Committee noted that the Penalty Guide recommended a fine of $200 for a breach of the Rule and that fines imposed have ranged from $150-250. In this case, a fine at the lower end of the range submitted by Mrs Williams was appropriate

JCA Decision Fields (raw)

Dmitry: This section contains all JCA fields migrated from the raw data.

Data from these fields should be mapped appropriately to display amongst the standard fields above; please make note of any values below that are missing in the above standard fields but should be there.

hearingid: 79c801c1da77f5ece07d6c7b71cab7db


informantnumber: 69329


horsename:


hearing_racingtype:


startdate: no date provided


newcharge:


plea: admitted


penaltyrequired: 1


decisiondate: 16/11/2010


hearing_title: N Z Metro 12 November 2010 - R 5


charge:

Struck and moved inside marker line


facts:

Following the running of Race 5, The Marque Hotel Christchurch Graduation Series (Final) Mobile Pace, an information was filed by Stipendiary Steward, Mrs K R Williams, against Licensed Open Driver, Mr R T May, alleging a breach of Rule 869 (7A) (a) & (b) in that Mr May, as the driver of WAIPAWA JUNIOR in the race, “struck and shifted inside the track marker line in the run home”.
 
Mr May was present at the hearing of the information and he indicated that he did not admit the breach.
 
Rule 869 provides as follows:
(7A) Every horseman who moves inwards shall ensure:
(a)         that contact is not made with any track marker
(b)         that any part of the sulky does not protrude inside the marker line.
 
It shall be a defence to a breach of this sub-rule if the horseman establishes that the breach was attributable to the behaviour of his own horse or any other horseman in the race.

 


appealdecision:


isappeal:


submissionsfordecision:

Mrs Williams pointed out to the Committee that WAIPAWA JUNIOR had been disqualified from the race at an earlier protest hearing pursuant to Rule 869 (7B). At that protest hearing, the trainer of the horse, Mr G R Dunn, had not contested the protest.
 
Mrs Williams showed video replays of the run home. She pointed out Mr May, driving WAIPAWA JUNIOR, racing 3-back on the markers turning for home. He then shifted into the passing lane, striking one marker, going inside a second marker and coming out just before the third marker. Mrs Williams said that the horse did “head in there” but Mr May continued to use the whip and reins and activated the removable hood. She submitted that Mr May had a “lack of control” of the horse which allowed it to shift inside the marker line, without being steered in there.
 
Mr May said that the horse was having its second raceday start and the race had been run in a very fast time of 3-11.6 for the mobile 2600 metres. When he pulled the horse in, he did not realise that he was “in that far”. The horse had shied away from the cart in front, which was a wide cart. Mr May said that, although the horse had lost 5th placing, he had not affected any other runner. He also stated that the horse had been distracted by several track markers dislodged by a runner in front. There was room for the horse in the early stages of the passing lane although it did get tight at a later stage of the run home, he said.

 


reasonsfordecision:

The Committee found that Mr May did angle WAIPAWA JUNIOR into the passing lane after being 3-back on the markers turning for home. From that point, the horse’s sulky wheel struck one track marker and ran inside another. Mr May did not dispute this.
 
The Committee further found that Mr May did not take sufficient steps to ensure that the horse did not go inside the track marker line. The Committee noted Mr May’s submissions as to the horse’s inexperience, the fast time and the other matters he referred to. In the Committee’s view, these were contributing factors at best. Further, it was not a defence for Mr May to say that he did not realise how far inside the marker line he had gone.
 
The Committee was not satisfied that Mr May took all reasonable or possible steps to prevent the horse going inside the track marker line.

 


Decision:

The charge was found proved.

sumissionsforpenalty:

Mrs Williams said that the race was a $15,000 Graduation Series final. She submitted that the usual fine for a breach of the Rule is $200. In this case, she submitted that the fine should be between $200-300 because of the class of race. Mr May had no previous breaches of the Rule. Mrs Williams acknowledged that the present breach was less serious than a case where a driver goes inside the markers to gain a run to which he is not entitled. In this case, it was a simple lack of attention.
 
Mr May submitted that the breach was a minor one.
 

reasonsforpenalty:

The Committee in determining penalty took into account Mr May’s previous good record and that the breach was at the lower end of a scale of seriousness. It also took into account that the horse’s inexperience may have been a contributing factor. The Committee noted that the Penalty Guide recommended a fine of $200 for a breach of the Rule and that fines imposed have ranged from $150-250. In this case, a fine at the lower end of the range submitted by Mrs Williams was appropriate

penalty:

Mr May was fined the sum of $200.


hearing_type: Hearing


Rules: 869(7A)(a) and (b)


Informant: Mrs K Williams, Stipendiary Steward


JockeysandTrainer: Mr R May, Licensed Open Driver


Otherperson:


PersonPresent:


Respondent:


StipendSteward:


raceid: 80ffc5d0d08be3b5f3d9dd95f8f2ed74


race_expapproval:


racecancelled: 0


race_noreport: 0


race_emailed1: 0


race_emailed2: 0


race_title: R 5


submittochair:


race_expappcomment:


race_km:


race_otherexp:


race_chair:


race_pm1:


race_pm2:


meetid: bab6c5f7098464b9171add13cecdf413


meet_expapproval:


meet_noreport: 0


waitingforpublication: 0


meet_emailed1: 0


meet_emailed2: 0


meetdate: 12/11/2010


meet_title: NZ Metro TC - 12 November 2010


meet_expappcomment:


meet_km:


meet_otherexp:


tracklocation: nz-metro-tc


meet_racingtype: harness-racing


meet_chair: RMcKenzie


meet_pm1: JPhelan


meet_pm2: none


name: NZ Metro TC