Archive Decision

This decision has been migrated from the JCA website. Information is accurate but formatting may differ from contemporary decisions. Please contact us for any further enquiries.

Marton JC 14 September 2019 – R 5 – Chair, Mrs N Moffatt

ID: JCA14320

Applicant:
Mr N Goodwin - Stipendiary Steward

Respondent(s):
Mr J Kamaruddin - Apprentice Rider

Other Person:
Ms K Clapperton - Central Districts Apprentice Mentor, Mr D Balcombe - Stipendiary Steward

Information Number:
A12299

Hearing Type:
Hearing

New Charge:
Excessive Use of the Whip

Rules:
638(3)(b)(ii)

Plea:
admitted

Code:
Thoroughbred

Meet Title:
Marton JC - 14 September 2019

Meet Chair:
NMoffatt

Meet Committee Member 1:
TUtikere

Race Date:
2019/09/14

Race Number:
R 5

Decision:

As Mr Kamaruddin admitted the breach, the charge was deemed proved.

Penalty:

Accordingly, Mr Kamaruddin is suspended from the close of racing today Saturday, September 14th up to and including racing on Sunday, September 29th.

Facts:

Following Race 5 (H&T Agronomics/Agricom Handicap)) Mr Goodwin lodged an information with the Judicial Committee alleging a breach of Rule 638 (3) (b) (ii) in that Apprentice J Kamaruddin used his whip excessively prior to the 100 metres.

At the outset of the hearing Mr Kamaruddin confirmed that he understood the Rule and that he admitted the breach. He explained that he had 3 months of race riding experience and 24 race day rides.

Mr Goodwin played all available films of the race from the top of the straight until past the 100-metre mark. He identified Mr Kamaruddin and conservatively counted him strike his horse 18 times before reaching the 100m. Mr Goodwin said the whip was used behind the saddle and in a continuous manner with no respite.

Ms Clapperton said the films were clear and the breach obvious.

Submissions for Penalty:

Mr Goodwin said this was the first time Mr Kamaruddin had breached the whip rule and explained that if it had been 7 strikes, he might have received a warning, but 18 was beyond what was acceptable. When presented with a winning chance, Mr Kamaruddin had “thrown caution to the wind”. Mr Goodwin submitted that a penalty in the vicinity of 2 weeks suspension would send a message to other riders that this manner of whip use would not be tolerated.

In response to a question from the Committee, Mr Goodwin said there had been two other occasions he was aware of where first-time whip offenders had received suspensions instead of a monetary penalty.

Ms Clapperton said that Mr Kamaruddin was inexperienced and riding for a very competitive stable where limited opportunities might possibly exert some pressure on a young apprentice. She expressed concern that while using the whip in the manner he did, he is not looking where he is going and this needs to be immediately addressed.

Ms Clapperton said Mr Kamaruddin would benefit from further time with Mr Noel Harris.

Mr Kamaruddin asked the Committee to consider a fine due to his youth and inexperience.

Reasons for Penalty:

The Penalty Guide for Judicial Committees provides the following starting points for breaches of Rule 638(3) (b) (ii):

1st breach---$300

2nd breach---$500

3rd or subsequent breach-6-8 national riding days

Mr Kamaruddin is inexperienced but well aware of the guidelines. When asked by the Committee, he could clearly explain the 5-on, 5-off pattern of acceptable whip use. Today’s breach falls such a long way outside of the guidelines that, in our opinion, it cannot be dealt with by means of a fine. A suspension is necessary to highlight the gravity of the breach to Mr Kamaruddin and also as a deterrent to other riders.

The Committee took into account a previous first-time breach (Bakar) where a 12-day suspension was imposed. On that occasion the rider raised the whip above the shoulder and used it in a very forceful manner going on to win the race. Mr Kamaruddin’s breach, while high end falls a little below that level.

The Committee noted Mr Kamaruddin’s body language during viewing of the films which indicated embarrassment and remorse at the way he used his whip. We hope this attitude will help him learn to use the whip within the guidelines.

Balancing up all factors, it was our opinion that a 10-day suspension was an appropriate penalty.

JCA Decision Fields (raw)

Dmitry: This section contains all JCA fields migrated from the raw data.

Data from these fields should be mapped appropriately to display amongst the standard fields above; please make note of any values below that are missing in the above standard fields but should be there.

hearingid: 749f0cac840e73c8a6b2fd8017ec743a


informantnumber: A12299


horsename:


hearing_racingtype:


startdate: no date provided


newcharge: Excessive Use of the Whip


plea: admitted


penaltyrequired: 1


decisiondate: 16/09/2019


hearing_title: Marton JC 14 September 2019 - R 5 - Chair, Mrs N Moffatt


charge:


facts:

Following Race 5 (H&T Agronomics/Agricom Handicap)) Mr Goodwin lodged an information with the Judicial Committee alleging a breach of Rule 638 (3) (b) (ii) in that Apprentice J Kamaruddin used his whip excessively prior to the 100 metres.

At the outset of the hearing Mr Kamaruddin confirmed that he understood the Rule and that he admitted the breach. He explained that he had 3 months of race riding experience and 24 race day rides.

Mr Goodwin played all available films of the race from the top of the straight until past the 100-metre mark. He identified Mr Kamaruddin and conservatively counted him strike his horse 18 times before reaching the 100m. Mr Goodwin said the whip was used behind the saddle and in a continuous manner with no respite.

Ms Clapperton said the films were clear and the breach obvious.


appealdecision:


isappeal:


submissionsfordecision:


reasonsfordecision:


Decision:

As Mr Kamaruddin admitted the breach, the charge was deemed proved.


sumissionsforpenalty:

Mr Goodwin said this was the first time Mr Kamaruddin had breached the whip rule and explained that if it had been 7 strikes, he might have received a warning, but 18 was beyond what was acceptable. When presented with a winning chance, Mr Kamaruddin had “thrown caution to the wind”. Mr Goodwin submitted that a penalty in the vicinity of 2 weeks suspension would send a message to other riders that this manner of whip use would not be tolerated.

In response to a question from the Committee, Mr Goodwin said there had been two other occasions he was aware of where first-time whip offenders had received suspensions instead of a monetary penalty.

Ms Clapperton said that Mr Kamaruddin was inexperienced and riding for a very competitive stable where limited opportunities might possibly exert some pressure on a young apprentice. She expressed concern that while using the whip in the manner he did, he is not looking where he is going and this needs to be immediately addressed.

Ms Clapperton said Mr Kamaruddin would benefit from further time with Mr Noel Harris.

Mr Kamaruddin asked the Committee to consider a fine due to his youth and inexperience.


reasonsforpenalty:

The Penalty Guide for Judicial Committees provides the following starting points for breaches of Rule 638(3) (b) (ii):

1st breach---$300

2nd breach---$500

3rd or subsequent breach-6-8 national riding days

Mr Kamaruddin is inexperienced but well aware of the guidelines. When asked by the Committee, he could clearly explain the 5-on, 5-off pattern of acceptable whip use. Today’s breach falls such a long way outside of the guidelines that, in our opinion, it cannot be dealt with by means of a fine. A suspension is necessary to highlight the gravity of the breach to Mr Kamaruddin and also as a deterrent to other riders.

The Committee took into account a previous first-time breach (Bakar) where a 12-day suspension was imposed. On that occasion the rider raised the whip above the shoulder and used it in a very forceful manner going on to win the race. Mr Kamaruddin’s breach, while high end falls a little below that level.

The Committee noted Mr Kamaruddin’s body language during viewing of the films which indicated embarrassment and remorse at the way he used his whip. We hope this attitude will help him learn to use the whip within the guidelines.

Balancing up all factors, it was our opinion that a 10-day suspension was an appropriate penalty.


penalty:

Accordingly, Mr Kamaruddin is suspended from the close of racing today Saturday, September 14th up to and including racing on Sunday, September 29th.


hearing_type: Hearing


Rules: 638(3)(b)(ii)


Informant: Mr N Goodwin - Stipendiary Steward


JockeysandTrainer: Mr J Kamaruddin - Apprentice Rider


Otherperson: Ms K Clapperton - Central Districts Apprentice Mentor, Mr D Balcombe - Stipendiary Steward


PersonPresent:


Respondent:


StipendSteward:


raceid: 820b419e6afb08ce89cfe5b7241b2416


race_expapproval:


racecancelled: 0


race_noreport: 0


race_emailed1: 0


race_emailed2: 0


race_title: R 5


submittochair:


race_expappcomment:


race_km:


race_otherexp:


race_chair:


race_pm1:


race_pm2:


meetid: 4b1e28821ec9116105ab961047f52fa4


meet_expapproval:


meet_noreport: 0


waitingforpublication: 0


meet_emailed1: 0


meet_emailed2: 0


meetdate: 14/09/2019


meet_title: Marton JC - 14 September 2019


meet_expappcomment:


meet_km:


meet_otherexp:


tracklocation: marton-jc


meet_racingtype: thoroughbred-racing


meet_chair: NMoffatt


meet_pm1: TUtikere


meet_pm2: none


name: Marton JC