Marlborough RC – 28 April 2011 – R 4
ID: JCA14423
Code:
Thoroughbred
Meet Title:
Marlborough RC - 28 April 2011
Meet Chair:
JPhelan
Meet Committee Member 1:
JMillar
Race Date:
2011/04/28
Race Number:
R 4
Decision:
As Mr Prendergast had admitted this breach of the Rules it was found to be proved in accordance with Rules 914 and 915(1)(d).
Penalty:
Mr and Mrs Prendergast were fined the sum of $100-00.
Charge:
Alleged breach of Rule 616(3)
Facts:
Following the running of Race 4, the Criterion Hotel Rating 70, an Information was filed by Stipendiary Steward Mr R. Neal against Licensed Trainers Mr A. W. and Mrs L. R. Prendergast, the Trainers of “Limoux” (9), alleging a breach of Rule 616(3) in that they presented this horse to race in blinkers which were not notified.
The charge reads as follows.
“I the above named informant allege that the above named Defendant committed a breach of Rule 616(3) in that co-trainer Mr T. Prendergast presented Limoux to race in blinkers which were not notified.
Rule 616(3) reads as follows,
“(3) When permission has been obtained in accordance with sub-Rule (2) of this Rule 616 for the use of an item or items of Notifiable Gear on a horse, such item or items of Notifiable Gear will continue to be used without variation on the horse concerned in consecutive subsequent Races unless permission has been obtained from a Stipendiary Steward before the horse is accepted or is deemed to be accepted for a subsequent Race, or the Trainer is otherwise approved or instructed by a Stipendiary Steward to change or adjust the Notifiable Gear that is to be used for that horse.”
Mr Prendergast had indicated on the Information that this breach was admitted, and also that he did not wish to attend the hearing.
Submissions for Penalty:
In relation to penalty Mr Neal submitted that a fine of $100-00 should be imposed in this case.
Reasons for Penalty:
We were satisfied that a fine of $100-00 was appropriate in this case.
JCA Decision Fields (raw)
Dmitry: This section contains all JCA fields migrated from the raw data.
Data from these fields should be mapped appropriately to display amongst the standard fields above; please make note of any values below that are missing in the above standard fields but should be there.
hearingid: 8171f42bc66a532db24cc18417c967a7
informantnumber: 5323
horsename:
hearing_racingtype:
startdate: no date provided
newcharge:
plea: admitted
penaltyrequired: 1
decisiondate: 14/04/2011
hearing_title: Marlborough RC - 28 April 2011 - R 4
charge:
Alleged breach of Rule 616(3)
facts:
Following the running of Race 4, the Criterion Hotel Rating 70, an Information was filed by Stipendiary Steward Mr R. Neal against Licensed Trainers Mr A. W. and Mrs L. R. Prendergast, the Trainers of “Limoux” (9), alleging a breach of Rule 616(3) in that they presented this horse to race in blinkers which were not notified.
The charge reads as follows.
“I the above named informant allege that the above named Defendant committed a breach of Rule 616(3) in that co-trainer Mr T. Prendergast presented Limoux to race in blinkers which were not notified.
Rule 616(3) reads as follows,
“(3) When permission has been obtained in accordance with sub-Rule (2) of this Rule 616 for the use of an item or items of Notifiable Gear on a horse, such item or items of Notifiable Gear will continue to be used without variation on the horse concerned in consecutive subsequent Races unless permission has been obtained from a Stipendiary Steward before the horse is accepted or is deemed to be accepted for a subsequent Race, or the Trainer is otherwise approved or instructed by a Stipendiary Steward to change or adjust the Notifiable Gear that is to be used for that horse.”
Mr Prendergast had indicated on the Information that this breach was admitted, and also that he did not wish to attend the hearing.
appealdecision:
isappeal:
submissionsfordecision:
reasonsfordecision:
Decision:
As Mr Prendergast had admitted this breach of the Rules it was found to be proved in accordance with Rules 914 and 915(1)(d).
sumissionsforpenalty:
In relation to penalty Mr Neal submitted that a fine of $100-00 should be imposed in this case.
reasonsforpenalty:
We were satisfied that a fine of $100-00 was appropriate in this case.
penalty:
Mr and Mrs Prendergast were fined the sum of $100-00.
hearing_type: Hearing
Rules: 616(3)
Informant: Mr R. Neal - Stipendiary Steward
JockeysandTrainer: Mr A. W. and Mrs L. R. Prendergast - Licensed Trainers
Otherperson:
PersonPresent:
Respondent:
StipendSteward:
raceid: ffb565afa17f014dbfef9bd230178c00
race_expapproval:
racecancelled: 0
race_noreport: 0
race_emailed1: 0
race_emailed2: 0
race_title: R 4
submittochair:
race_expappcomment:
race_km:
race_otherexp:
race_chair:
race_pm1:
race_pm2:
meetid: 9f867679d03cc39f6b834d0c4ec1720b
meet_expapproval:
meet_noreport: 0
waitingforpublication: 0
meet_emailed1: 0
meet_emailed2: 0
meetdate: 28/04/2011
meet_title: Marlborough RC - 28 April 2011
meet_expappcomment:
meet_km:
meet_otherexp:
tracklocation: marlborough-rc
meet_racingtype: thoroughbred-racing
meet_chair: JPhelan
meet_pm1: JMillar
meet_pm2: none
name: Marlborough RC