Archive Decision

This decision has been migrated from the JCA website. Information is accurate but formatting may differ from contemporary decisions. Please contact us for any further enquiries.

Levin RC – 14 September 2007 –

ID: JCA21089

Hearing Type:
Old Hearing

Rules:
302.5.a

Hearing Type (Code):
harness-racing

Decision:

Mr Laursen appeared before the committee in relation to an alleged breach of Rule 302 (5) (a) of the Rules of Racing.   It was alleged that Mr Laursen employed Miss S Satherley to work as a stablehand for him when Miss Satherley was unlicensed.



Mr Laursen appeared before the committee in relation to an alleged breach of Rule 302 (5) (a) of the Rules of Racing.

--

It was alleged that Mr Laursen employed Miss S Satherley to work as a stablehand for him when Miss Satherley was unlicensed.

--

Mr Laursen admitted the breach.

--

 

--

PENALTY

--

Mr Goodwin, when addressing the committee, submitted that a modest fine was the appropriate penalty to be imposed, while Mr Laursen, in his submissions, stated that he believed the matter only warranted the committee issuing a warning.

--

When considering the question of penalty the committee are mindful that a clear obligation rested with Mr Laursen to ensure that Miss Satherley was licensed, or at least had applied to be licensed, when she commenced her employment with him. Although this requirement is relatively new it nevertheless has been well publicised of late and on this occasion Mr Laursen has not discharged his obligations as required.

--

Mr Laursen was aware of his duty and as such a warning is not appropriate, but rather a fine is the penalty that should be imposed.

--

A factor in mitigation is that Mr Laursen has readily admitted the breach. The committee also recognises that this rule has only recently been adopted and as such some latitude should be accorded.

--

After taking all matters into account it is this committees finding that Mr Laursen be fined the sum of $50.00

--

 

--

RLH Neal,

--

Chairman

Decision Date: 14/09/2007

Publish Date: 14/09/2007

JCA Decision Fields (raw)

Dmitry: This section contains all JCA fields migrated from the raw data.

Data from these fields should be mapped appropriately to display amongst the standard fields above; please make note of any values below that are missing in the above standard fields but should be there.

hearingid: 9fa2d6b64d925c4b2509294357ab08d5


informantnumber:


horsename:


hearing_racingtype: harness-racing


startdate: 14/09/2007


newcharge:


plea:


penaltyrequired:


decisiondate: no date provided


hearing_title: Levin RC - 14 September 2007 -


charge:


facts:


appealdecision:


isappeal:


submissionsfordecision:


reasonsfordecision:


Decision:

Mr Laursen appeared before the committee in relation to an alleged breach of Rule 302 (5) (a) of the Rules of Racing.   It was alleged that Mr Laursen employed Miss S Satherley to work as a stablehand for him when Miss Satherley was unlicensed.



Mr Laursen appeared before the committee in relation to an alleged breach of Rule 302 (5) (a) of the Rules of Racing.

--

It was alleged that Mr Laursen employed Miss S Satherley to work as a stablehand for him when Miss Satherley was unlicensed.

--

Mr Laursen admitted the breach.

--

 

--

PENALTY

--

Mr Goodwin, when addressing the committee, submitted that a modest fine was the appropriate penalty to be imposed, while Mr Laursen, in his submissions, stated that he believed the matter only warranted the committee issuing a warning.

--

When considering the question of penalty the committee are mindful that a clear obligation rested with Mr Laursen to ensure that Miss Satherley was licensed, or at least had applied to be licensed, when she commenced her employment with him. Although this requirement is relatively new it nevertheless has been well publicised of late and on this occasion Mr Laursen has not discharged his obligations as required.

--

Mr Laursen was aware of his duty and as such a warning is not appropriate, but rather a fine is the penalty that should be imposed.

--

A factor in mitigation is that Mr Laursen has readily admitted the breach. The committee also recognises that this rule has only recently been adopted and as such some latitude should be accorded.

--

After taking all matters into account it is this committees finding that Mr Laursen be fined the sum of $50.00

--

 

--

RLH Neal,

--

Chairman


sumissionsforpenalty:


reasonsforpenalty:


penalty:


hearing_type: Old Hearing


Rules: 302.5.a


Informant:


JockeysandTrainer:


Otherperson:


PersonPresent:


Respondent:


StipendSteward:


raceid:


race_expapproval:


racecancelled:


race_noreport:


race_emailed1:


race_emailed2:


race_title:


submittochair:


race_expappcomment:


race_km:


race_otherexp:


race_chair:


race_pm1:


race_pm2:


meetid:


meet_expapproval:


meet_noreport:


waitingforpublication:


meet_emailed1:


meet_emailed2:


meetdate: no date provided


meet_title:


meet_expappcomment:


meet_km:


meet_otherexp:


tracklocation:


meet_racingtype:


meet_chair:


meet_pm1:


meet_pm2:


name: