Archive Decision

This decision has been migrated from the JCA website. Information is accurate but formatting may differ from contemporary decisions. Please contact us for any further enquiries.

Kaikoura TC – 31 October 2005 – Race 2

ID: JCA22604

Hearing Type:
Old Hearing

Hearing Type (Code):
harness-racing

Meet Title:
Kaikoura TC - 31 October 2005

Race Date:
2005/10/31

Race Number:
Race 2

Decision: --

Following the running of Race 2, New Commercial Hotel Trot, an information instigating a protest was filed by Chief Stipendiary Steward, Mr N R Escott, against GOOD CHARLOTTE (D D McCormick), placed 3rd following the disqualification of MONARO MISS from 3rd placing, on the grounds of breaking from its gait with 2100 metres to run and 500 metres to run.



--

DECISION AND REASONS:

--

Following the running of Race 2, New Commercial Hotel Trot, an information instigating a protest was filed by Chief Stipendiary Steward, Mr N R Escott, against GOOD CHARLOTTE (D D McCormick), placed 3rd following the disqualification of MONARO MISS from 3rd placing, on the grounds of breaking from its gait with 2100 metres to run and 500 metres to run.

--

Mr McCormick, part-owner, trainer and driver of GOOD CHARLOTTE, appeared at the hearing of the information.

--

Mr B R Willians, Assistant Stipendiary Steward, showed video replays of the relevant parts of the race. Mr Williams pointed out GOOD CHARLOTTE break from its gait with approximately 2100 metres to run when racing on the outside of and behind the then leader, MONARO MISS, which also broke. The horse continued in a gallop for a distance before regaining its proper gait. Mr McCormick submitted that the breaking of his horse was a consequence of interference from the breaking MONARO MISS.

--

Mr Williams then pointed out GOOD CHARLOTTE, with approximately 500 metres to run, break and continue in a gallop for approximately 70 metres. Mr Williams alleged that the horse had failed to lose ground in the break.

--

Mr Escott sought disqualification of MONARO MISS from the race.

--

 

--

Mr McCormick did not dispute that GOOD CHARLOTTE had galloped for 70 metres at the 500 metres but he denied that it had failed to lose ground by the break.

--

The Committee was not satisfied that grounds for relegation or disqualification of GOOD CHARLOTTE had been made out by the Informant in respect of that horse's breaking with 2100 metres to run. However, in relation the breaking from its gait with 500 metres to run, the Committee was satisfied that GOOD CHARLOTTE:

--
    --
  • broke from its gait;
  • --
  • failed to promptly regain its proper gait in that it galloped for a distance of 70 metres;
  • --
  • failed to lose ground by the break; and
  • --
  • gained an advantage.
--

The Committee was satisfied that GOOD CHARLOTTE should be disqualified from the race and, accordingly, the protest was upheld and GOOD CHARLOTTE disqualified.

--

Consequent upon the disqualification, the amended placings for the race are as follows:

--

1st 13 Starwood in Aspen

--

2nd 5 Love Hate Revenge

--

3rd 11 Mentor

--

4th 12 Shezadorabil

--

5th 3 Coco Kid

--

 

--

--

JUDICIAL COMMITTEE

--

JCA Decision Fields (raw)

Dmitry: This section contains all JCA fields migrated from the raw data.

Data from these fields should be mapped appropriately to display amongst the standard fields above; please make note of any values below that are missing in the above standard fields but should be there.

hearingid: fc33bddf48ccd94d98520c21dae8d607


informantnumber:


horsename:


hearing_racingtype: harness-racing


startdate: 31/10/2005


newcharge:


plea:


penaltyrequired:


decisiondate: no date provided


hearing_title: Kaikoura TC - 31 October 2005 - Race 2


charge:


facts:


appealdecision:


isappeal:


submissionsfordecision:


reasonsfordecision:


Decision:

--

Following the running of Race 2, New Commercial Hotel Trot, an information instigating a protest was filed by Chief Stipendiary Steward, Mr N R Escott, against GOOD CHARLOTTE (D D McCormick), placed 3rd following the disqualification of MONARO MISS from 3rd placing, on the grounds of breaking from its gait with 2100 metres to run and 500 metres to run.



--

DECISION AND REASONS:

--

Following the running of Race 2, New Commercial Hotel Trot, an information instigating a protest was filed by Chief Stipendiary Steward, Mr N R Escott, against GOOD CHARLOTTE (D D McCormick), placed 3rd following the disqualification of MONARO MISS from 3rd placing, on the grounds of breaking from its gait with 2100 metres to run and 500 metres to run.

--

Mr McCormick, part-owner, trainer and driver of GOOD CHARLOTTE, appeared at the hearing of the information.

--

Mr B R Willians, Assistant Stipendiary Steward, showed video replays of the relevant parts of the race. Mr Williams pointed out GOOD CHARLOTTE break from its gait with approximately 2100 metres to run when racing on the outside of and behind the then leader, MONARO MISS, which also broke. The horse continued in a gallop for a distance before regaining its proper gait. Mr McCormick submitted that the breaking of his horse was a consequence of interference from the breaking MONARO MISS.

--

Mr Williams then pointed out GOOD CHARLOTTE, with approximately 500 metres to run, break and continue in a gallop for approximately 70 metres. Mr Williams alleged that the horse had failed to lose ground in the break.

--

Mr Escott sought disqualification of MONARO MISS from the race.

--

 

--

Mr McCormick did not dispute that GOOD CHARLOTTE had galloped for 70 metres at the 500 metres but he denied that it had failed to lose ground by the break.

--

The Committee was not satisfied that grounds for relegation or disqualification of GOOD CHARLOTTE had been made out by the Informant in respect of that horse's breaking with 2100 metres to run. However, in relation the breaking from its gait with 500 metres to run, the Committee was satisfied that GOOD CHARLOTTE:

--
    --
  • broke from its gait;
  • --
  • failed to promptly regain its proper gait in that it galloped for a distance of 70 metres;
  • --
  • failed to lose ground by the break; and
  • --
  • gained an advantage.
--

The Committee was satisfied that GOOD CHARLOTTE should be disqualified from the race and, accordingly, the protest was upheld and GOOD CHARLOTTE disqualified.

--

Consequent upon the disqualification, the amended placings for the race are as follows:

--

1st 13 Starwood in Aspen

--

2nd 5 Love Hate Revenge

--

3rd 11 Mentor

--

4th 12 Shezadorabil

--

5th 3 Coco Kid

--

 

--

--

JUDICIAL COMMITTEE

--


sumissionsforpenalty:


reasonsforpenalty:


penalty:


hearing_type: Old Hearing


Rules:


Informant:


JockeysandTrainer:


Otherperson:


PersonPresent:


Respondent:


StipendSteward:


raceid: 323bcc780e1f3567211dfe6babddf825


race_expapproval:


racecancelled: 0


race_noreport: 0


race_emailed1: 0


race_emailed2: 0


race_title: Race 2


submittochair:


race_expappcomment:


race_km:


race_otherexp:


race_chair:


race_pm1:


race_pm2:


meetid: 2180a2ce72cf75a6c3b901f1fecd6e3c


meet_expapproval:


meet_noreport: 0


waitingforpublication: 0


meet_emailed1: 0


meet_emailed2: 0


meetdate: 31/10/2005


meet_title: Kaikoura TC - 31 October 2005


meet_expappcomment:


meet_km:


meet_otherexp:


tracklocation: kaikoura-tc


meet_racingtype: harness-racing


meet_chair:


meet_pm1:


meet_pm2:


name: Kaikoura TC