Invercargill HRC – 4 February 2006 – Race 2
ID: JCA19425
Hearing Type (Code):
harness-racing
Meet Title:
Invercargill HRC - 4 February 2006
Race Date:
2006/02/04
Race Number:
Race 2
Decision:
Driver, Mr SG Dickson, was charged with a breach of Rule 869(6)(b) & (c).
--
--
Decision and Reason:
--All parties agreed that evidence given at the previous protest was to be accepted without alteration.
--Mr Allison once again explained (Using video footage) his interpretation and why he felt that Mr Dickson's action in moving out when he did, was in breach of rule 869 (6) (b) & (c).
--Mr Dickson was adamant that his actions did not affect any other horse but he stated that he understood the rule that he was being charged with and agreed to disagree on the point of law.
--The committee upheld the charge and Mr Dickson was fined the sum of $250.00.
--REASONS: The committee were of the firm belief that Mr Dickson 's horse did clearly move out as outlined in the protest decision (Inf no. 12195).
----
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
JCA Decision Fields (raw)
Dmitry: This section contains all JCA fields migrated from the raw data.
Data from these fields should be mapped appropriately to display amongst the standard fields above; please make note of any values below that are missing in the above standard fields but should be there.
hearingid: 52c5e198140d6da5734d57cd3c0a4939
informantnumber:
horsename:
hearing_racingtype: harness-racing
startdate: 04/02/2006
newcharge:
plea:
penaltyrequired:
decisiondate: no date provided
hearing_title: Invercargill HRC - 4 February 2006 - Race 2
charge:
facts:
appealdecision:
isappeal:
submissionsfordecision:
reasonsfordecision:
Decision:
Driver, Mr SG Dickson, was charged with a breach of Rule 869(6)(b) & (c).
--
--
Decision and Reason:
--All parties agreed that evidence given at the previous protest was to be accepted without alteration.
--Mr Allison once again explained (Using video footage) his interpretation and why he felt that Mr Dickson's action in moving out when he did, was in breach of rule 869 (6) (b) & (c).
--Mr Dickson was adamant that his actions did not affect any other horse but he stated that he understood the rule that he was being charged with and agreed to disagree on the point of law.
--The committee upheld the charge and Mr Dickson was fined the sum of $250.00.
--REASONS:
The committee were of the firm belief that Mr Dickson 's horse did clearly move out as outlined in the protest decision (Inf no. 12195).----
--
--
--
-- --
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
sumissionsforpenalty:
reasonsforpenalty:
penalty:
hearing_type: Old Hearing
Rules: 869.6.b
Informant:
JockeysandTrainer:
Otherperson:
PersonPresent:
Respondent:
StipendSteward:
raceid: f3a714efb350e7be2ead234998205a59
race_expapproval:
racecancelled: 0
race_noreport: 0
race_emailed1: 0
race_emailed2: 0
race_title: Race 2
submittochair:
race_expappcomment:
race_km:
race_otherexp:
race_chair:
race_pm1:
race_pm2:
meetid: 51bd2e2d58c453a75df226639de81e37
meet_expapproval:
meet_noreport: 0
waitingforpublication: 0
meet_emailed1: 0
meet_emailed2: 0
meetdate: 04/02/2006
meet_title: Invercargill HRC - 4 February 2006
meet_expappcomment:
meet_km:
meet_otherexp:
tracklocation: invercargill-hrc
meet_racingtype: harness-racing
meet_chair:
meet_pm1:
meet_pm2:
name: Invercargill HRC