Archive Decision

This decision has been migrated from the JCA website. Information is accurate but formatting may differ from contemporary decisions. Please contact us for any further enquiries.

Feilding JC 3 June 2010 – R 9 (instigating a protest)

ID: JCA19176

Hearing Type:
Old Hearing

Rules:
642(1)

Code:
Thoroughbred

Hearing Type (Code):
thoroughbred-racing

Meet Title:
Feilding JC - 3 June 2010

Meet Chair:
tom

Meet Committee Member 1:
tom

Meet Committee Member 2:
tom

Race Date:
2010/06/03

Race Number:
R 9

Decision: --

RACEDAY JUDICIAL COMMITTEE DECISION

--

Informant:  Paul Pascoe - Trainer of WHATA TESER

--

Defendant:  V. Johnston - Rider of RAPID VOYAGE

--

Information No:  31090 (instigating a protest)

--

Meeting:  Feilding Jockey Club

--

Date:  3 June 2010

--

Venue:  Awapuni

--

Race:  9

--

Rule No:  642(1)

--

Judicial Committee:  N. Moffatt, Chairman - T. Castles, Committee Member

--

Also Present:  R.Myers (rider of WHATA TESER) and

--

Mr John Barneo (part-owner of RAPID VOYAGE)

--

 

--

CHARGES:

--

This was a protest lodged by Mr Pascoe alleging that RAPID VOYAGE or its rider placed 1st by the judge interfered with the chances of WHATA TESER placed 2nd by the judge. The interference occurred in the home straight.

--

 

--

FACTS:

--

The judge’s placings were:

--

1st   RAPID VOYAGE

--

2nd  WHATA TESER

--

3rd   TEASJAH

--

4th   MAJESTIC RANSOM

--

 

--

The official margin between 1st and 2nd placed horses was half a neck.

--

 

--

SUBMISSIONS:

--

Mr Pascoe showed the head-on, side-on and rear view videos of the final stages of the race outlining where he believed his horse suffered interference. He said that RAPID VOYAGE had rolled outwards and lent on WHATA TESER for several strides affecting that horse’s chances.

--

 

--

Ms Myers said that she was travelling really well until RAPID VOYAGE made contact with her which caused her to lose a little bit of balance. She did not have to stop riding but said that her momentum had been affected by the interference.

--

 

--

Ms Johnson admitted shifting outwards on RAPID VOYAGE but said that the other horse had moved inwards as much as she had moved outwards. When the two horses came into contact she pulled her mount off and became unbalanced as well.

--

 

--

Mr Barneo said that both horses had moved off their line but no momentum had been lost by WHATA TESER. He said that if the other horse had won he would have had a case to protest himself.

--

 

--

For the stewards Mr Goodwin said that both horses became unbalanced when contact was made and that both horses had shifted ground.

--

 

--

DECISION:

--

After considering all the submissions and viewing the films the protest was dismissed and placings were allowed to stand as called by the judge.

--

 

--

REASONS:

--

While the committee accepted that the two horses came together and made contact we were not convinced that the winner could be held solely responsible for the interference. The films were clear in showing that while RAPID VOYAGE did move outwards WHATA TESER moved inwards at the same time. Both horses had contributed to the incident.

--

 

--

It was also noted that Ms Myers was not making any ground on the winner nor was she prevented from riding her mount out to the finish.

--

 

--

 

--

N. Moffatt                                T. Castles

--

CHAIR                                      Committee Member

--

31090

--

 

--

 

--

 

--

JCA Decision Fields (raw)

Dmitry: This section contains all JCA fields migrated from the raw data.

Data from these fields should be mapped appropriately to display amongst the standard fields above; please make note of any values below that are missing in the above standard fields but should be there.

hearingid: 2be84a4207fee37e23ab69d2d119f48c


informantnumber:


horsename:


hearing_racingtype: thoroughbred-racing


startdate: 03/06/2010


newcharge:


plea:


penaltyrequired:


decisiondate: no date provided


hearing_title: Feilding JC 3 June 2010 - R 9 (instigating a protest)


charge:


facts:


appealdecision:


isappeal:


submissionsfordecision:


reasonsfordecision:


Decision:

--

RACEDAY JUDICIAL COMMITTEE DECISION

--

Informant:  Paul Pascoe - Trainer of WHATA TESER

--

Defendant:  V. Johnston - Rider of RAPID VOYAGE

--

Information No:  31090 (instigating a protest)

--

Meeting:  Feilding Jockey Club

--

Date:  3 June 2010

--

Venue:  Awapuni

--

Race:  9

--

Rule No:  642(1)

--

Judicial Committee:  N. Moffatt, Chairman - T. Castles, Committee Member

--

Also Present:  R.Myers (rider of WHATA TESER) and

--

Mr John Barneo (part-owner of RAPID VOYAGE)

--

 

--

CHARGES:

--

This was a protest lodged by Mr Pascoe alleging that RAPID VOYAGE or its rider placed 1st by the judge interfered with the chances of WHATA TESER placed 2nd by the judge. The interference occurred in the home straight.

--

 

--

FACTS:

--

The judge’s placings were:

--

1st   RAPID VOYAGE

--

2nd  WHATA TESER

--

3rd   TEASJAH

--

4th   MAJESTIC RANSOM

--

 

--

The official margin between 1st and 2nd placed horses was half a neck.

--

 

--

SUBMISSIONS:

--

Mr Pascoe showed the head-on, side-on and rear view videos of the final stages of the race outlining where he believed his horse suffered interference. He said that RAPID VOYAGE had rolled outwards and lent on WHATA TESER for several strides affecting that horse’s chances.

--

 

--

Ms Myers said that she was travelling really well until RAPID VOYAGE made contact with her which caused her to lose a little bit of balance. She did not have to stop riding but said that her momentum had been affected by the interference.

--

 

--

Ms Johnson admitted shifting outwards on RAPID VOYAGE but said that the other horse had moved inwards as much as she had moved outwards. When the two horses came into contact she pulled her mount off and became unbalanced as well.

--

 

--

Mr Barneo said that both horses had moved off their line but no momentum had been lost by WHATA TESER. He said that if the other horse had won he would have had a case to protest himself.

--

 

--

For the stewards Mr Goodwin said that both horses became unbalanced when contact was made and that both horses had shifted ground.

--

 

--

DECISION:

--

After considering all the submissions and viewing the films the protest was dismissed and placings were allowed to stand as called by the judge.

--

 

--

REASONS:

--

While the committee accepted that the two horses came together and made contact we were not convinced that the winner could be held solely responsible for the interference. The films were clear in showing that while RAPID VOYAGE did move outwards WHATA TESER moved inwards at the same time. Both horses had contributed to the incident.

--

 

--

It was also noted that Ms Myers was not making any ground on the winner nor was she prevented from riding her mount out to the finish.

--

 

--

 

--

N. Moffatt                                T. Castles

--

CHAIR                                      Committee Member

--

31090

--

 

--

 

--

 

--

sumissionsforpenalty:


reasonsforpenalty:


penalty:


hearing_type: Old Hearing


Rules: 642(1)


Informant:


JockeysandTrainer:


Otherperson:


PersonPresent:


Respondent:


StipendSteward:


raceid: bf9b945ab1ac815bfba96bd1029106e8


race_expapproval:


racecancelled: 0


race_noreport: 0


race_emailed1: 0


race_emailed2: 0


race_title: R 9


submittochair:


race_expappcomment:


race_km:


race_otherexp:


race_chair:


race_pm1:


race_pm2:


meetid: 519249622622eae64ba57ff6f3a29283


meet_expapproval:


meet_noreport: 0


waitingforpublication: 0


meet_emailed1: 0


meet_emailed2: 0


meetdate: 03/06/2010


meet_title: Feilding JC - 3 June 2010


meet_expappcomment:


meet_km:


meet_otherexp:


tracklocation: feilding-jc


meet_racingtype: thoroughbred-racing


meet_chair: tom


meet_pm1: tom


meet_pm2: tom


name: Feilding JC