Archive Decision

This decision has been migrated from the JCA website. Information is accurate but formatting may differ from contemporary decisions. Please contact us for any further enquiries.

Canterbury JC 2 October 2010 – R1 (request for a ruling)

ID: JCA20144

Hearing Type:
Old Hearing

Rules:
632

Code:
Thoroughbred

Hearing Type (Code):
thoroughbred-racing

Meet Title:
Canterbury JC - 2 October 2010

Meet Chair:
tom

Meet Committee Member 1:
tom

Meet Committee Member 2:
tom

Race Date:
2010/10/02

Race Number:
R 1

Decision: --

RACEDAY JUDICIAL COMMITTEE DECISION

--

Informant:  Mr M Williamson, Stipendiary Steward

--

Defendant:  N/A

--

Information No:  41713 - Request for a Ruling

--

Meeting:  Canterbury Jockey Club

--

Date:  2 October 2010

--

Venue:  Canterbury Park

--

Race: 1

--

Rule No:  632

--

Judicial Committee:  KG Hales, Chairman - J Millar, Committee Member

--

Plea:  N/A

--

Also Present:  Stipendiary Stewards J McLaughlin and M Davidson, Ms S Payne, Starter, Mr B Hibberd, Assistant Starter and Ms DS Johnson, Rider of “Calgacus”

--

 

--

DECISION:

--

Following the running of Race 1, Stipendiary Steward Mr M Williamson, requested a ruling with regard to an incident at the start. 

--

 

--

He stated in the information requesting a ruling as follows:

--

 

--

“”Calgacus” (D Johnson) was denied a fair start due to a mechanical failure.

--

 

--

The request was made pursuant to Rule 632 which reads as follows:

--

 

--

If, in the opinion of the Judicial Committee, a horse which does not finish in the first three placings was prevented from taking an effective part in a race owing to the mechanical failure of the starting stalls, or is denied a fair start and such occurrence materially prejudiced the chances of that horse (but not where the horse is slow away of its own accord, the Judicial Committee may declare such horse to be a non-starter.”

--

 

--

Mr Williamson advised the hearing that Ms S Payne, the Starter, had activated the electronic start but that the gates failed to open.  She accordingly signalled to her assistant starter, Mr B Hibberd, who was in a position at the end of the starting gates, adjacent to Stall 1, to activate the start manually.

--

 

--

However, what Mr Hibberd did not realise, because he was not in a position whereby he could see, that “Calgacus” was rearing in its stall.  Thus, at the time the gates opened, “Calgacus” was rearing, and missed the start by at least 3 lengths. 

--

 

--

Ms Johnson, the rider of “Calgacus”, told the hearing that she had taken hold of part of the stall to steady herself, and as a consequence she was not ready for a start. 

--

“Calgacus” finished in seventh place. 

--

 

--

Ms Payne and Mr Hibberd both confirmed what Mr Williamson had outlined. 

--

 

--

Mr Hibberd thought that there may have been up to a 10 second lapse of time between Ms Payne attempting to activate the start by electronic means, and him activating the start manually.  He further said that if he had been aware of the circumstances, he would not have released the starting gates.

--

 

--

We find as follows:

--

 

--

a)      There was a failure of the electronic starting mechanism;

--

b)      That the starting gates were then opened manually by Mr Hibberd, Assistant Starter;

--

c)      That Mr Hibberd was not in a position whereby he could see the horses in the starting gates when activating the manual start;

--

d)      That “Calgacus” reared in the time frame between Ms Payne notifying Mr Hibberd of the electronic failure, and Mr Hibberd activating the start manually;

--

e)      As a consequence of “Calgacus” rearing, Ms Johnson was not ready for a start;

--

f)        “Calgacus” was a favoured runner;

--

g)      “Calgacus” finished in seventh place. 

--

 

--

As a consequence of our findings, we are bound to conclude, in terms of Rule 632 that because of the events which occurred in the intervening period between the failure of the electronic system and the opening of the starting gates manually, that “Calgacus” was denied a fair start and that such occurrence materially prejudiced the chances of that horse.

--

 

--

DECISION

--

 

--

“Calgacus” is therefore declared a non-starter.

--

 

--

 

--

JCA Decision Fields (raw)

Dmitry: This section contains all JCA fields migrated from the raw data.

Data from these fields should be mapped appropriately to display amongst the standard fields above; please make note of any values below that are missing in the above standard fields but should be there.

hearingid: 3f4e9d8cdcb09bb1a6cdb7b39d2ebdb2


informantnumber:


horsename:


hearing_racingtype: thoroughbred-racing


startdate: 02/10/2010


newcharge:


plea:


penaltyrequired:


decisiondate: no date provided


hearing_title: Canterbury JC 2 October 2010 - R1 (request for a ruling)


charge:


facts:


appealdecision:


isappeal:


submissionsfordecision:


reasonsfordecision:


Decision:

--

RACEDAY JUDICIAL COMMITTEE DECISION

--

Informant:  Mr M Williamson, Stipendiary Steward

--

Defendant:  N/A

--

Information No:  41713 - Request for a Ruling

--

Meeting:  Canterbury Jockey Club

--

Date:  2 October 2010

--

Venue:  Canterbury Park

--

Race: 1

--

Rule No:  632

--

Judicial Committee:  KG Hales, Chairman - J Millar, Committee Member

--

Plea:  N/A

--

Also Present:  Stipendiary Stewards J McLaughlin and M Davidson, Ms S Payne, Starter, Mr B Hibberd, Assistant Starter and Ms DS Johnson, Rider of “Calgacus”

--

 

--

DECISION:

--

Following the running of Race 1, Stipendiary Steward Mr M Williamson, requested a ruling with regard to an incident at the start. 

--

 

--

He stated in the information requesting a ruling as follows:

--

 

--

“”Calgacus” (D Johnson) was denied a fair start due to a mechanical failure.

--

 

--

The request was made pursuant to Rule 632 which reads as follows:

--

 

--

If, in the opinion of the Judicial Committee, a horse which does not finish in the first three placings was prevented from taking an effective part in a race owing to the mechanical failure of the starting stalls, or is denied a fair start and such occurrence materially prejudiced the chances of that horse (but not where the horse is slow away of its own accord, the Judicial Committee may declare such horse to be a non-starter.”

--

 

--

Mr Williamson advised the hearing that Ms S Payne, the Starter, had activated the electronic start but that the gates failed to open.  She accordingly signalled to her assistant starter, Mr B Hibberd, who was in a position at the end of the starting gates, adjacent to Stall 1, to activate the start manually.

--

 

--

However, what Mr Hibberd did not realise, because he was not in a position whereby he could see, that “Calgacus” was rearing in its stall.  Thus, at the time the gates opened, “Calgacus” was rearing, and missed the start by at least 3 lengths. 

--

 

--

Ms Johnson, the rider of “Calgacus”, told the hearing that she had taken hold of part of the stall to steady herself, and as a consequence she was not ready for a start. 

--

“Calgacus” finished in seventh place. 

--

 

--

Ms Payne and Mr Hibberd both confirmed what Mr Williamson had outlined. 

--

 

--

Mr Hibberd thought that there may have been up to a 10 second lapse of time between Ms Payne attempting to activate the start by electronic means, and him activating the start manually.  He further said that if he had been aware of the circumstances, he would not have released the starting gates.

--

 

--

We find as follows:

--

 

--

a)      There was a failure of the electronic starting mechanism;

--

b)      That the starting gates were then opened manually by Mr Hibberd, Assistant Starter;

--

c)      That Mr Hibberd was not in a position whereby he could see the horses in the starting gates when activating the manual start;

--

d)      That “Calgacus” reared in the time frame between Ms Payne notifying Mr Hibberd of the electronic failure, and Mr Hibberd activating the start manually;

--

e)      As a consequence of “Calgacus” rearing, Ms Johnson was not ready for a start;

--

f)        “Calgacus” was a favoured runner;

--

g)      “Calgacus” finished in seventh place. 

--

 

--

As a consequence of our findings, we are bound to conclude, in terms of Rule 632 that because of the events which occurred in the intervening period between the failure of the electronic system and the opening of the starting gates manually, that “Calgacus” was denied a fair start and that such occurrence materially prejudiced the chances of that horse.

--

 

--

DECISION

--

 

--

“Calgacus” is therefore declared a non-starter.

--

 

--

 

--

sumissionsforpenalty:


reasonsforpenalty:


penalty:


hearing_type: Old Hearing


Rules: 632


Informant:


JockeysandTrainer:


Otherperson:


PersonPresent:


Respondent:


StipendSteward:


raceid: 86f58a0d18050326b6302e7473f9bef7


race_expapproval:


racecancelled: 0


race_noreport: 0


race_emailed1: 0


race_emailed2: 0


race_title: R 1


submittochair:


race_expappcomment:


race_km:


race_otherexp:


race_chair:


race_pm1:


race_pm2:


meetid: 3e71b4b679e78fa122359e33321e2c85


meet_expapproval:


meet_noreport: 0


waitingforpublication: 0


meet_emailed1: 0


meet_emailed2: 0


meetdate: 02/10/2010


meet_title: Canterbury JC - 2 October 2010


meet_expappcomment:


meet_km:


meet_otherexp:


tracklocation: canterbury-jc


meet_racingtype: thoroughbred-racing


meet_chair: tom


meet_pm1: tom


meet_pm2: tom


name: Canterbury JC