Auckland RC – 26 December 2007 – Race 2
ID: JCA19785
Code:
Thoroughbred
Hearing Type (Code):
thoroughbred-racing
Meet Title:
Auckland RC - 26 December 2007
Race Date:
2007/12/26
Race Number:
Race 2
Decision:
Following Race 2 a protest was lodged Mr B Wallace pursuant to Rule 876(1) when it was alleged that NUKE TIME or its rider placed 1st by the Judge interfered with the chances of ENCANTADA placed 2nd by the Judge.
Following Race 2 a protest was lodged Mr B Wallace pursuant to Rule 876(1) when it was alleged that NUKE TIME or its rider placed 1st by the Judge interfered with the chances of ENCANTADA placed 2nd by the Judge.
--The interference occurred in the final straight.
--The Judges margin between 1st and 2nd was a short head.
--Present were Mr B Wallace and A Peard representing ENCANTADA
--Mr D Ellis and M Walker represented NUKE TIME
--The informant, Mr B Wallace, demonstrated the video films and showed NUKE TIME with ENCANTADA racing on its outside soon after entering the straight. Both of the horses had clear vision ahead. As they progressed down the straight NUKE TIME could be seen to move across ENCANTADA’s line. As they progressed closer to the winning post ENCANTADA had to change ground to come round NUKE TIME and got to within a short head of the winner.
--Mr Walker, the rider of NUKE TIME, showed the side – on video where, in his opinion he was always at least a clear length ahead of ENCANTADA when he moved out and at no time did he hinder the horse. At no time could Mr Peard be seen to stop riding ENCAANTADA during NUKE TIME’s outward movement.
--Mr Ellis thought that it was significant that the protest was not initiated by the Stipendary Stewards. He also claimed that there was always two lengths between the two horses and also observed that Mr Peard could not be seen to have stopped riding his mount out.
--Chief Stipendary Steward Mr C George, when asked for his observation said that, in his view during NUKE TIME’s outward movement there was always a clearance between the two horses and that Mr Peard could not be seen to stop riding.
--After reviewing the evidence, including the videos, the committee find that at no time did NUKE TIME hinder ENANTADA by taking it’s line in the straight because it was always the required distance clear during the movement.
--The protest is therefore dismissed and the Judges places will stand.
----
D C Johnstone R M Seabrook
--CHAIRMAN
JCA Decision Fields (raw)
Dmitry: This section contains all JCA fields migrated from the raw data.
Data from these fields should be mapped appropriately to display amongst the standard fields above; please make note of any values below that are missing in the above standard fields but should be there.
hearingid: 6ee0b7d8efb6e42bbefd4cf22c9a3b3b
informantnumber:
horsename:
hearing_racingtype: thoroughbred-racing
startdate: 26/12/2007
newcharge:
plea:
penaltyrequired:
decisiondate: no date provided
hearing_title: Auckland RC - 26 December 2007 - Race 2
charge:
facts:
appealdecision:
isappeal:
submissionsfordecision:
reasonsfordecision:
Decision:
Following Race 2 a protest was lodged Mr B Wallace pursuant to Rule 876(1) when it was alleged that NUKE TIME or its rider placed 1st by the Judge interfered with the chances of ENCANTADA placed 2nd by the Judge.
Following Race 2 a protest was lodged Mr B Wallace pursuant to Rule 876(1) when it was alleged that NUKE TIME or its rider placed 1st by the Judge interfered with the chances of ENCANTADA placed 2nd by the Judge.
--The interference occurred in the final straight.
--The Judges margin between 1st and 2nd was a short head.
--Present were Mr B Wallace and A Peard representing ENCANTADA
--Mr D Ellis and M Walker represented NUKE TIME
--The informant, Mr B Wallace, demonstrated the video films and showed NUKE TIME with ENCANTADA racing on its outside soon after entering the straight. Both of the horses had clear vision ahead. As they progressed down the straight NUKE TIME could be seen to move across ENCANTADA’s line. As they progressed closer to the winning post ENCANTADA had to change ground to come round NUKE TIME and got to within a short head of the winner.
--Mr Walker, the rider of NUKE TIME, showed the side – on video where, in his opinion he was always at least a clear length ahead of ENCANTADA when he moved out and at no time did he hinder the horse. At no time could Mr Peard be seen to stop riding ENCAANTADA during NUKE TIME’s outward movement.
--Mr Ellis thought that it was significant that the protest was not initiated by the Stipendary Stewards. He also claimed that there was always two lengths between the two horses and also observed that Mr Peard could not be seen to have stopped riding his mount out.
--Chief Stipendary Steward Mr C George, when asked for his observation said that, in his view during NUKE TIME’s outward movement there was always a clearance between the two horses and that Mr Peard could not be seen to stop riding.
--After reviewing the evidence, including the videos, the committee find that at no time did NUKE TIME hinder ENANTADA by taking it’s line in the straight because it was always the required distance clear during the movement.
--The protest is therefore dismissed and the Judges places will stand.
----
D C Johnstone R M Seabrook
--CHAIRMAN
sumissionsforpenalty:
reasonsforpenalty:
penalty:
hearing_type: Old Hearing
Rules: 876.1
Informant:
JockeysandTrainer:
Otherperson:
PersonPresent:
Respondent:
StipendSteward:
raceid: 9c12c6091a022567a9d64cccb46c7552
race_expapproval:
racecancelled: 0
race_noreport: 0
race_emailed1: 0
race_emailed2: 0
race_title: Race 2
submittochair:
race_expappcomment:
race_km:
race_otherexp:
race_chair:
race_pm1:
race_pm2:
meetid: c9e36a65f738db8916b455d393be48df
meet_expapproval:
meet_noreport: 0
waitingforpublication: 0
meet_emailed1: 0
meet_emailed2: 0
meetdate: 26/12/2007
meet_title: Auckland RC - 26 December 2007
meet_expappcomment:
meet_km:
meet_otherexp:
tracklocation: auckland-rc
meet_racingtype: thoroughbred-racing
meet_chair:
meet_pm1:
meet_pm2:
name: Auckland RC