Auckland RC – 25 January 2009 – Race 4
ID: JCA21555
Code:
Thoroughbred
Hearing Type (Code):
thoroughbred-racing
Meet Title:
Auckland RC - 25 January 2009
Race Date:
2009/01/25
Race Number:
Race 4
Decision:
Following Race 4 a protest was lodged by Mr B Wallace, trainer of the second horse “Sufficient”, pursuant to Rule 876 (1). He alleged that Mill Duckie placed 1st by the judge caused interference to Sufficient placed second by the judge. He alleged the interference occurred over the concluding stages.
Following Race 4 a protest was lodged by Mr B Wallace, trainer of the second horse “Sufficient”, pursuant to Rule 876 (1). He alleged that Mill Duckie placed 1st by the judge caused interference to Sufficient placed second by the judge. He alleged the interference occurred over the concluding stages.
----
Mr Wallace demonstrated the video films and showed in the concluding stages his horse Sufficient received interference from Mill Duckie when that horse moved out causing a bump to Sufficient’s hindquarters. He also said Mr Innes lost his balance.
----
Mr Innes confirmed the evidence of Mr Wallace and said the interference cost him ½ length.
----
Ms Collett, rider of Mill Duckie, said there was no contact between the two, Mr Innes didn’t stop riding and Sufficient was never going to beat her horse.
----
Mr Collett, Trainer of Mill Duckie said his horse came from behind Sufficient and there was no substantial movement on Mill Duckie’s part.
----
Mr Oatham when asked for his assessment said there was minor contact but was not satisfied Sufficient would have beaten Mill Duckie had interference not occurred.
----
Mr Wallace in summing up said interference had occurred which in his opinion affected the result.
----
DECISION
----
The Committee carefully considered all evidence and while conceding Mill Duckie moved out slightly was not satisfied this was enough to affect the outcome of the race.
----
Another factor was that Mr Innes did not stop riding at any stage and there was no contact between the two.
----
Accordingly the protest is dismissed.
----
--
Richard Seabrook
--Chairman
JCA Decision Fields (raw)
Dmitry: This section contains all JCA fields migrated from the raw data.
Data from these fields should be mapped appropriately to display amongst the standard fields above; please make note of any values below that are missing in the above standard fields but should be there.
hearingid: d07941c2929fe1ef9d1a2f2f8a740111
informantnumber:
horsename:
hearing_racingtype: thoroughbred-racing
startdate: 25/01/2009
newcharge:
plea:
penaltyrequired:
decisiondate: no date provided
hearing_title: Auckland RC - 25 January 2009 - Race 4
charge:
facts:
appealdecision:
isappeal:
submissionsfordecision:
reasonsfordecision:
Decision:
Following Race 4 a protest was lodged by Mr B Wallace, trainer of the second horse “Sufficient”, pursuant to Rule 876 (1). He alleged that Mill Duckie placed 1st by the judge caused interference to Sufficient placed second by the judge. He alleged the interference occurred over the concluding stages.
Following Race 4 a protest was lodged by Mr B Wallace, trainer of the second horse “Sufficient”, pursuant to Rule 876 (1). He alleged that Mill Duckie placed 1st by the judge caused interference to Sufficient placed second by the judge. He alleged the interference occurred over the concluding stages.
----
Mr Wallace demonstrated the video films and showed in the concluding stages his horse Sufficient received interference from Mill Duckie when that horse moved out causing a bump to Sufficient’s hindquarters. He also said Mr Innes lost his balance.
----
Mr Innes confirmed the evidence of Mr Wallace and said the interference cost him ½ length.
----
Ms Collett, rider of Mill Duckie, said there was no contact between the two, Mr Innes didn’t stop riding and Sufficient was never going to beat her horse.
----
Mr Collett, Trainer of Mill Duckie said his horse came from behind Sufficient and there was no substantial movement on Mill Duckie’s part.
----
Mr Oatham when asked for his assessment said there was minor contact but was not satisfied Sufficient would have beaten Mill Duckie had interference not occurred.
----
Mr Wallace in summing up said interference had occurred which in his opinion affected the result.
----
DECISION
----
The Committee carefully considered all evidence and while conceding Mill Duckie moved out slightly was not satisfied this was enough to affect the outcome of the race.
----
Another factor was that Mr Innes did not stop riding at any stage and there was no contact between the two.
----
Accordingly the protest is dismissed.
----
--
Richard Seabrook
--Chairman
sumissionsforpenalty:
reasonsforpenalty:
penalty:
hearing_type: Old Hearing
Rules: 876.1
Informant:
JockeysandTrainer:
Otherperson:
PersonPresent:
Respondent:
StipendSteward:
raceid: 0eff97b16537205542ab33cbaa672dcf
race_expapproval:
racecancelled: 0
race_noreport: 0
race_emailed1: 0
race_emailed2: 0
race_title: Race 4
submittochair:
race_expappcomment:
race_km:
race_otherexp:
race_chair:
race_pm1:
race_pm2:
meetid: 49cea077f4d94764a6cd065be6ff167d
meet_expapproval:
meet_noreport: 0
waitingforpublication: 0
meet_emailed1: 0
meet_emailed2: 0
meetdate: 25/01/2009
meet_title: Auckland RC - 25 January 2009
meet_expappcomment:
meet_km:
meet_otherexp:
tracklocation: auckland-rc
meet_racingtype: thoroughbred-racing
meet_chair:
meet_pm1:
meet_pm2:
name: Auckland RC