Archive Decision

This decision has been migrated from the JCA website. Information is accurate but formatting may differ from contemporary decisions. Please contact us for any further enquiries.

NZ Metro TC 21 May 2010 – R 3 (instigating a protest)

ID: JCA20199

Hearing Type:
Old Hearing

Rules:
870(5)

Hearing Type (Code):
harness-racing

Meet Title:
NZ Metro TC - 21 May 2010

Meet Chair:
tom

Meet Committee Member 1:
tom

Meet Committee Member 2:
tom

Race Date:
2010/05/21

Race Number:
R 3

Decision: --

RACEDAY JUDICIAL COMMITTEE DECISION

--

Informant:  Mr N R Escott – Chief Stipendiary Steward

--

Defendant:  N/A

--

Information No:  13973 (instigating a protest) 

--

Meeting:  New Zealand Metropolitan Trotting Club

--

Date:  21 May 2010

--

Venue:  Addington Raceway

--

Race:  3 – Walker Davey Lt Mobile Pace

--

Rule No:  870(5)

--

Judicial Committee:  J M Phelan, Chairman – R G McKenzie, L N McCutcheon, Committee Members 

--

 

--

FACTS:

--

Following the running of Race 3, the Walker Davey Ltd Mobile Pace, an information Instigating a Protest was filed by Chief Stipendiary Steward Mr N. R. Escott alleging a breach of the “lapped on” Rule, Rule 870(5), by “Lilac Splash” (10) driven by Mr R. T. May.

--

 

--

The Information reads as follows.

--

 

--

“This is a protest against horse number 10 placed 3rd by the Judge on the grounds of breaking from its gait (Rule 870(5)) lapped on over the final stages.”

--

 

--

Rule 870(5) provides as follows.

--

 

--

“(5) Notwithstanding the provisions of sub-rule (4) hereof any horse which is not in the correct gait when its nose reaches the finishing line and which is lapped on by any other horse or horses in the correct gait shall be placed by the Judicial Committee behind such horse or horses provided that where such first mentioned horse is not in its correct gait as a result of interference to such horse or its horseman, then (subject to Rule 869(8)) such relegation of the horse shall be at the discretion of the Judicial Committee.”

--

 

--

Mr Escott gave evidence and used video coverage to show that “Lilac Splash” had broken from its correct gait a short distance before the finishing line, and was still in its incorrect gait when it reached the finishing line.  At that time it was lapped on by the 4th horse, “San Fran Lady” (9), the 5th horse “Seshney Bromac” (5), and the 6th horse “Sounds Alive” (4). The official margins between the 3rd and the 6th horses were a nose, a nose and .7 of a length.

--

 

--

Mr D. A. Taylor, the trainer of “Lilac Splash”, had endorsed the Information – “I do not contest protest”.

--

 

--

SUBMISSION:

--

Mr Escott made submissions that “Lilac Splash” be relegated from 3rd to 6th place.

--

 

--

DECISION:

--

We were satisfied that “Lilac Splash” was lapped on as alleged, and that the protest was not contested.  Accordingly “Lilac Splash” was relegated from 3rd to 6th place, with the amended places being as follows.

--

 

--

1st – Magicol Topaz (1)

--

2nd – Renaissance Franco (6)

--

3rd – San Fran Lady (9)

--

4th – Seshny Bromac (5)

--

5th – Sounds Alive (4)

--

6th – Lilac Splash (10)

--

 

--

 

--

J M Phelan                   R G McKenzie and L N McCutcheon

--

CHAIR                         Committee Members

--

13973

--

 

--

 

--

 

--

                         

--

 

--

 

--

JCA Decision Fields (raw)

Dmitry: This section contains all JCA fields migrated from the raw data.

Data from these fields should be mapped appropriately to display amongst the standard fields above; please make note of any values below that are missing in the above standard fields but should be there.

hearingid: 48d7e312bafdbbf9ad084a6e56c3419b


informantnumber:


horsename:


hearing_racingtype: harness-racing


startdate: 21/05/2010


newcharge:


plea:


penaltyrequired:


decisiondate: no date provided


hearing_title: NZ Metro TC 21 May 2010 - R 3 (instigating a protest)


charge:


facts:


appealdecision:


isappeal:


submissionsfordecision:


reasonsfordecision:


Decision:

--

RACEDAY JUDICIAL COMMITTEE DECISION

--

Informant:  Mr N R Escott – Chief Stipendiary Steward

--

Defendant:  N/A

--

Information No:  13973 (instigating a protest) 

--

Meeting:  New Zealand Metropolitan Trotting Club

--

Date:  21 May 2010

--

Venue:  Addington Raceway

--

Race:  3 – Walker Davey Lt Mobile Pace

--

Rule No:  870(5)

--

Judicial Committee:  J M Phelan, Chairman – R G McKenzie, L N McCutcheon, Committee Members 

--

 

--

FACTS:

--

Following the running of Race 3, the Walker Davey Ltd Mobile Pace, an information Instigating a Protest was filed by Chief Stipendiary Steward Mr N. R. Escott alleging a breach of the “lapped on” Rule, Rule 870(5), by “Lilac Splash” (10) driven by Mr R. T. May.

--

 

--

The Information reads as follows.

--

 

--

“This is a protest against horse number 10 placed 3rd by the Judge on the grounds of breaking from its gait (Rule 870(5)) lapped on over the final stages.”

--

 

--

Rule 870(5) provides as follows.

--

 

--

“(5) Notwithstanding the provisions of sub-rule (4) hereof any horse which is not in the correct gait when its nose reaches the finishing line and which is lapped on by any other horse or horses in the correct gait shall be placed by the Judicial Committee behind such horse or horses provided that where such first mentioned horse is not in its correct gait as a result of interference to such horse or its horseman, then (subject to Rule 869(8)) such relegation of the horse shall be at the discretion of the Judicial Committee.”

--

 

--

Mr Escott gave evidence and used video coverage to show that “Lilac Splash” had broken from its correct gait a short distance before the finishing line, and was still in its incorrect gait when it reached the finishing line.  At that time it was lapped on by the 4th horse, “San Fran Lady” (9), the 5th horse “Seshney Bromac” (5), and the 6th horse “Sounds Alive” (4). The official margins between the 3rd and the 6th horses were a nose, a nose and .7 of a length.

--

 

--

Mr D. A. Taylor, the trainer of “Lilac Splash”, had endorsed the Information – “I do not contest protest”.

--

 

--

SUBMISSION:

--

Mr Escott made submissions that “Lilac Splash” be relegated from 3rd to 6th place.

--

 

--

DECISION:

--

We were satisfied that “Lilac Splash” was lapped on as alleged, and that the protest was not contested.  Accordingly “Lilac Splash” was relegated from 3rd to 6th place, with the amended places being as follows.

--

 

--

1st – Magicol Topaz (1)

--

2nd – Renaissance Franco (6)

--

3rd – San Fran Lady (9)

--

4th – Seshny Bromac (5)

--

5th – Sounds Alive (4)

--

6th – Lilac Splash (10)

--

 

--

 

--

J M Phelan                   R G McKenzie and L N McCutcheon

--

CHAIR                         Committee Members

--

13973

--

 

--

 

--

 

--

                         

--

 

--

 

--

sumissionsforpenalty:


reasonsforpenalty:


penalty:


hearing_type: Old Hearing


Rules: 870(5)


Informant:


JockeysandTrainer:


Otherperson:


PersonPresent:


Respondent:


StipendSteward:


raceid: 1fe756f59968b2fac91be11a365ce828


race_expapproval:


racecancelled: 0


race_noreport: 0


race_emailed1: 0


race_emailed2: 0


race_title: R 3


submittochair:


race_expappcomment:


race_km:


race_otherexp:


race_chair:


race_pm1:


race_pm2:


meetid: a77f6e025f38e78e76e56377aced0ff8


meet_expapproval:


meet_noreport: 0


waitingforpublication: 0


meet_emailed1: 0


meet_emailed2: 0


meetdate: 21/05/2010


meet_title: NZ Metro TC - 21 May 2010


meet_expappcomment:


meet_km:


meet_otherexp:


tracklocation: nz-metro-tc


meet_racingtype: harness-racing


meet_chair: tom


meet_pm1: tom


meet_pm2: tom


name: NZ Metro TC