Archive Decision

This decision has been migrated from the JCA website. Information is accurate but formatting may differ from contemporary decisions. Please contact us for any further enquiries.

Cambridge – Te Awamutu HRC – 29 July 2010 – R 6

ID: JCA19261

Hearing Type:
Old Hearing

Rules:
869(2)(a)

Hearing Type (Code):
harness-racing

Meet Title:
Cambridge - Te Awamutu HRC - 29 July 2010

Meet Chair:
tom

Meet Committee Member 1:
tom

Meet Committee Member 2:
tom

Race Date:
2010/07/29

Race Number:
R 6

Decision: --

RACEDAY JUDICIAL COMMITTEE DECISION

--

Informant: Stipendiary Steward Mr J Muirhead

--

Defendant:  Mr J Newberry

--

Information:  68538

--

Meeting:   Cambridge - Te Awamutu Harness Racing Club

--

Date:   29th July 2010

--

Venue:  Cambridge Raceway 

--

Race:   6

--

Rule No:  869(2)(a)

--

Judicial Committee:  B Rowe, Chairman – B Scott, Committee Member

--

Plea:  Not admitted

--

 

--

CHARGE(s):     

--

Used his whip excessively when driving HENRY DUCKET over the concluding stages of the race.

--

 

--

EVIDENCE:     

--

Mr Muirhead showed and interpreted the video film of the run down the home straight.  He said Mr Newberry struck his horse with the whip down the whole length of the straight – about 21 times.  He said there was no pause between some of the strikes.  In answer to Mr Newberry he said there was no set number of strikes which constituted excessive use and also said another driver was under investigation for a similar matter in the same race.  

--

 

--

Mr Newberry said his horse was within half a neck of winning the race and he had to look after the interests of the betting public.  He said he was not a cruel driver.

--

 

--

DECISION:  

--

The video evidence is inconclusive.  The horse was struck about 21 times, the last ten strikes being continuous.  Mr Newberry’s use of the whip was clearly outside the guidelines set by the Chief Stipendiary Steward in August 2009.  The charge is proven.

--

 

--

SUBMISSIONS ON PENALTY:

--

Mr Muirhead the recommended starting point was a fine of $250 or one week suspension.  He said this was Mr Newberry’s 7th drive for the season.  He had no other breaches recorded against him and the offending was in the upper half on the scale of seriousness.  He said some of the strikes were forceful.  He submitted the starting point was appropriate.

--

 

--

Mr Newberry said he would prefer a suspension.

--

             

--

REASONS:

--

In fixing penalty the committee takes into account the submissions of Mr Muirhead and Mr Newberry, the recommended starting point and treats the offending as mid range on the scale of seriousness.  The committee also takes into account penalties imposed for similar breaches of this rule.  The committee considers a suspension would be a meaningless penalty given the infrequent driving of Mr Newberry.  The committee does not find there are any mitigating factors warranting a deviation from the recommended starting point.

--

 

--

PENALTY:

--

A fine of $250 is imposed.

--

 

--

 

--

B Rowe                                                B Scott

--

Chair                                                   Committee Member

--

68538

--

 

--

JCA Decision Fields (raw)

Dmitry: This section contains all JCA fields migrated from the raw data.

Data from these fields should be mapped appropriately to display amongst the standard fields above; please make note of any values below that are missing in the above standard fields but should be there.

hearingid: 2dc2b510235e63ee158b906a66576eae


informantnumber:


horsename:


hearing_racingtype: harness-racing


startdate: 29/07/2010


newcharge:


plea:


penaltyrequired:


decisiondate: no date provided


hearing_title: Cambridge - Te Awamutu HRC - 29 July 2010 - R 6


charge:


facts:


appealdecision:


isappeal:


submissionsfordecision:


reasonsfordecision:


Decision:

--

RACEDAY JUDICIAL COMMITTEE DECISION

--

Informant: Stipendiary Steward Mr J Muirhead

--

Defendant:  Mr J Newberry

--

Information:  68538

--

Meeting:   Cambridge - Te Awamutu Harness Racing Club

--

Date:   29th July 2010

--

Venue:  Cambridge Raceway 

--

Race:   6

--

Rule No:  869(2)(a)

--

Judicial Committee:  B Rowe, Chairman – B Scott, Committee Member

--

Plea:  Not admitted

--

 

--

CHARGE(s):     

--

Used his whip excessively when driving HENRY DUCKET over the concluding stages of the race.

--

 

--

EVIDENCE:     

--

Mr Muirhead showed and interpreted the video film of the run down the home straight.  He said Mr Newberry struck his horse with the whip down the whole length of the straight – about 21 times.  He said there was no pause between some of the strikes.  In answer to Mr Newberry he said there was no set number of strikes which constituted excessive use and also said another driver was under investigation for a similar matter in the same race.  

--

 

--

Mr Newberry said his horse was within half a neck of winning the race and he had to look after the interests of the betting public.  He said he was not a cruel driver.

--

 

--

DECISION:  

--

The video evidence is inconclusive.  The horse was struck about 21 times, the last ten strikes being continuous.  Mr Newberry’s use of the whip was clearly outside the guidelines set by the Chief Stipendiary Steward in August 2009.  The charge is proven.

--

 

--

SUBMISSIONS ON PENALTY:

--

Mr Muirhead the recommended starting point was a fine of $250 or one week suspension.  He said this was Mr Newberry’s 7th drive for the season.  He had no other breaches recorded against him and the offending was in the upper half on the scale of seriousness.  He said some of the strikes were forceful.  He submitted the starting point was appropriate.

--

 

--

Mr Newberry said he would prefer a suspension.

--

             

--

REASONS:

--

In fixing penalty the committee takes into account the submissions of Mr Muirhead and Mr Newberry, the recommended starting point and treats the offending as mid range on the scale of seriousness.  The committee also takes into account penalties imposed for similar breaches of this rule.  The committee considers a suspension would be a meaningless penalty given the infrequent driving of Mr Newberry.  The committee does not find there are any mitigating factors warranting a deviation from the recommended starting point.

--

 

--

PENALTY:

--

A fine of $250 is imposed.

--

 

--

 

--

B Rowe                                                B Scott

--

Chair                                                   Committee Member

--

68538

--

 

--

sumissionsforpenalty:


reasonsforpenalty:


penalty:


hearing_type: Old Hearing


Rules: 869(2)(a)


Informant:


JockeysandTrainer:


Otherperson:


PersonPresent:


Respondent:


StipendSteward:


raceid: 74cd2cfdab111393a0841a24ce3b6691


race_expapproval:


racecancelled: 0


race_noreport: 0


race_emailed1: 0


race_emailed2: 0


race_title: R 6


submittochair:


race_expappcomment:


race_km:


race_otherexp:


race_chair:


race_pm1:


race_pm2:


meetid: 0ae3de64aa9d98bcc76a042c9372e38f


meet_expapproval:


meet_noreport: 0


waitingforpublication: 0


meet_emailed1: 0


meet_emailed2: 0


meetdate: 29/07/2010


meet_title: Cambridge - Te Awamutu HRC - 29 July 2010


meet_expappcomment:


meet_km:


meet_otherexp:


tracklocation: cambridge-te-awamutu-hrc


meet_racingtype: harness-racing


meet_chair: tom


meet_pm1: tom


meet_pm2: tom


name: Cambridge - Te Awamutu HRC