Archive Decision

This decision has been migrated from the JCA website. Information is accurate but formatting may differ from contemporary decisions. Please contact us for any further enquiries.

Wanganui JC 4 July 2019 – R 1 – Chair, Mrs N Moffatt

ID: JCA12542

Applicant:
Mr D Balcombe - Stipendiary Steward

Respondent(s):
Mr N Downs - Class D Rider

Other Person:
Mr J Oatham - Chief Stipendiary Steward

Information Number:
A11613

Hearing Type:
Hearing

New Charge:
Excessive use of whip

Rules:
638(3)(b)(ii)

Plea:
admitted

Code:
Thoroughbred

Meet Title:
Wanganui JC - 4 July 2019

Meet Chair:
NMoffatt

Meet Committee Member 1:
PWilliams

Race Date:
2019/07/04

Race Number:
R7

Decision:

As Mr Downs admitted the breach the charge was deemed proved.

Penalty:

 Accordingly, Mr Downs is suspended from the close of riding on Sunday, July 7th up to and including racing on Wednesday, August 7th.

Facts:

Following Race 1 (Alsco Maiden Highweight 2050) Mr Balcombe lodged an information with the Judicial Committee alleging a breach of Rule 638 (3) (b) (ii) in that N Downs used his whip excessively prior to the 100m without the necessary respite.

Mr Oatham showed the videos of the race from the top of the straight up to the 100m mark. Over this period Mr Oatham calculated Mr Downs struck his mount 15 times with a period of only three strides respite. Mr Downs won the race.

Mr Downs agreed with Mr Oatham’s assessment saying he had hit his horse “too much”.

Submissions for Penalty:

Mr Balcombe read out Mr Downs’ record in respect to the whip rule:

29/5/19     Waikato       $300
3/6/19       Auckland     $600

Mr Balcombe described today’s breach as above midrange, and the Stewards’ submission was for a period of suspension. In response to a question from the Chair, Mr Balcombe said Mr Downs' use of the whip was reasonably forceful but not anything out of the ordinary.

Mr Downs said he was trying to rectify his riding style but was having difficulty with the respite part. He said, without the whip, his horse would have stopped today in the heavy ground.

Mr Downs mentioned the lack of highweight/jumps riders and asked if any penalty could be dealt with by way of a fine instead of a suspension. He said he had already booked flights down to Timaru on Friday 12th July.

Reasons for Penalty:

The Penalty Guide for Judicial Committees provides the following starting points for breaches of Rule 638(3) (b) (ii):

1st breach                               $300
2nd breach                              $500
3rd or subsequent breach        6-8 national riding days

In determining penalty, the Committee considered all submissions.

We firstly considered Mr Downs' status as a Class D rider. It is generally accepted by Judicial Committees that, due to limited riding opportunities, the Penalty Guidelines be adjusted downwards to reflect the shorter riding season. In the case of Mr Fannin (May 2019), when facing his third charge in 12 months, the Committee adopted a starting point of four days. We believed it was appropriate to take the same approach today.

We identified several aggravating factors.

The Committee's observation of how many times Mr Downs used his whip led us to the opinion that 15 strikes was a conservative number. His continual use of the whip for most of the final straight, clearly demonstrated that Mr Downs did not, at any time, attempt to use the whip within the well-publicised whip guidelines (5-on/5-off). We considered the breach to be high-end.

Mr Downs' actions were highlighted by his leading position in the race, and with animal welfare a core concern of horse-racing and whip rules currently being reviewed around the world, a rider hitting their mount over the length of the straight is detrimental to the NZ racing industry.

Mr Downs breached the guidelines by quite some margin and won the race. We do not accept that heavy track conditions provide any excuse for excessive whip use.

Finally, Mr Downs' record is of concern to this Committee. Today’s breach was his third in just 6 weeks. The penalty guidelines provide a stepped approach for setting penalty with the consequences for repeat offending rising considerably. It appears that, in Mr Downs' case, previous penalties have not acted as a sufficient deterrent. A fine instead of suspension was not appropriate in this situation.

There were no mitigating factors.

Balancing up all factors, it was our opinion that a 7-day suspension was an appropriate penalty. (The 7 days incorporate only jumping/highweight meetings with two of these being premier jump days).

JCA Decision Fields (raw)

Dmitry: This section contains all JCA fields migrated from the raw data.

Data from these fields should be mapped appropriately to display amongst the standard fields above; please make note of any values below that are missing in the above standard fields but should be there.

hearingid: 6a94ee5ed8032d255e07779a81e0861e


informantnumber: A11613


horsename:


hearing_racingtype:


startdate: no date provided


newcharge: Excessive use of whip


plea: admitted


penaltyrequired: 1


decisiondate: 06/07/2019


hearing_title: Wanganui JC 4 July 2019 – R 1 - Chair, Mrs N Moffatt


charge:


facts:

Following Race 1 (Alsco Maiden Highweight 2050) Mr Balcombe lodged an information with the Judicial Committee alleging a breach of Rule 638 (3) (b) (ii) in that N Downs used his whip excessively prior to the 100m without the necessary respite.

Mr Oatham showed the videos of the race from the top of the straight up to the 100m mark. Over this period Mr Oatham calculated Mr Downs struck his mount 15 times with a period of only three strides respite. Mr Downs won the race.

Mr Downs agreed with Mr Oatham’s assessment saying he had hit his horse “too much”.


appealdecision:


isappeal:


submissionsfordecision:


reasonsfordecision:


Decision:

As Mr Downs admitted the breach the charge was deemed proved.


sumissionsforpenalty:

Mr Balcombe read out Mr Downs’ record in respect to the whip rule:

29/5/19     Waikato       $300
3/6/19       Auckland     $600

Mr Balcombe described today’s breach as above midrange, and the Stewards’ submission was for a period of suspension. In response to a question from the Chair, Mr Balcombe said Mr Downs' use of the whip was reasonably forceful but not anything out of the ordinary.

Mr Downs said he was trying to rectify his riding style but was having difficulty with the respite part. He said, without the whip, his horse would have stopped today in the heavy ground.

Mr Downs mentioned the lack of highweight/jumps riders and asked if any penalty could be dealt with by way of a fine instead of a suspension. He said he had already booked flights down to Timaru on Friday 12th July.


reasonsforpenalty:

The Penalty Guide for Judicial Committees provides the following starting points for breaches of Rule 638(3) (b) (ii):

1st breach                               $300
2nd breach                              $500
3rd or subsequent breach        6-8 national riding days

In determining penalty, the Committee considered all submissions.

We firstly considered Mr Downs' status as a Class D rider. It is generally accepted by Judicial Committees that, due to limited riding opportunities, the Penalty Guidelines be adjusted downwards to reflect the shorter riding season. In the case of Mr Fannin (May 2019), when facing his third charge in 12 months, the Committee adopted a starting point of four days. We believed it was appropriate to take the same approach today.

We identified several aggravating factors.

The Committee's observation of how many times Mr Downs used his whip led us to the opinion that 15 strikes was a conservative number. His continual use of the whip for most of the final straight, clearly demonstrated that Mr Downs did not, at any time, attempt to use the whip within the well-publicised whip guidelines (5-on/5-off). We considered the breach to be high-end.

Mr Downs' actions were highlighted by his leading position in the race, and with animal welfare a core concern of horse-racing and whip rules currently being reviewed around the world, a rider hitting their mount over the length of the straight is detrimental to the NZ racing industry.

Mr Downs breached the guidelines by quite some margin and won the race. We do not accept that heavy track conditions provide any excuse for excessive whip use.

Finally, Mr Downs' record is of concern to this Committee. Today’s breach was his third in just 6 weeks. The penalty guidelines provide a stepped approach for setting penalty with the consequences for repeat offending rising considerably. It appears that, in Mr Downs' case, previous penalties have not acted as a sufficient deterrent. A fine instead of suspension was not appropriate in this situation.

There were no mitigating factors.

Balancing up all factors, it was our opinion that a 7-day suspension was an appropriate penalty. (The 7 days incorporate only jumping/highweight meetings with two of these being premier jump days).


penalty:

 Accordingly, Mr Downs is suspended from the close of riding on Sunday, July 7th up to and including racing on Wednesday, August 7th.


hearing_type: Hearing


Rules: 638(3)(b)(ii)


Informant: Mr D Balcombe - Stipendiary Steward


JockeysandTrainer: Mr N Downs - Class D Rider


Otherperson: Mr J Oatham - Chief Stipendiary Steward


PersonPresent:


Respondent:


StipendSteward:


raceid: 9461cae992dec81c93130eab43f0b0fa


race_expapproval:


racecancelled: 0


race_noreport: 0


race_emailed1: 0


race_emailed2: 0


race_title: R7


submittochair:


race_expappcomment:


race_km:


race_otherexp:


race_chair:


race_pm1:


race_pm2:


meetid: 6d643468ca054b56637f58a30988a33a


meet_expapproval:


meet_noreport: 0


waitingforpublication: 0


meet_emailed1: 0


meet_emailed2: 0


meetdate: 04/07/2019


meet_title: Wanganui JC - 4 July 2019


meet_expappcomment:


meet_km:


meet_otherexp:


tracklocation: wanganui-jc


meet_racingtype: thoroughbred-racing


meet_chair: NMoffatt


meet_pm1: PWilliams


meet_pm2: none


name: Wanganui JC