Archive Decision

This decision has been migrated from the JCA website. Information is accurate but formatting may differ from contemporary decisions. Please contact us for any further enquiries.

R Tauranga 2 November 2012 – R 1 (instigating a protest)

ID: JCA10602

Applicant:
Mrs T Thornton, rider of SNIPPECHEE

Respondent(s):
Mr C Grylls, rider of JERSEY GIRL

Information Number:
4855

Hearing Type:
Protest

Rules:
642

Code:
Thoroughbred

Meet Title:
Racing Tauranga - 2 November 2012

Meet Chair:
RSeabrook

Meet Committee Member 1:
GTankard

Race Date:
2012/11/02

Race Number:
R1

Decision:

Accordingly after taking all the above into account we uphold the protest.  Therefore SNIPPECHEE is promoted to first.  Before considering the final result however the committee must refer to the second protest under information no. 4856.

Facts:

Following race 1 a protest was lodged pursuant to rule 642. The informant Mrs T Thornton alleged that the winner JERSEY GIRL interferred with the chances of her mount, SNIPPECHEE, placed second by the judge. She alleged this interference occurred in the final straight.

The Judges' placings were:

14  JERSEY GIRL  1st

2    SNIPPECHEE   2nd

3    SCHRODINGERS CAT  3rd

6    PINS GIFT   4th

4    TWELVE KINGDOMS  5th

The official margins were a nose between first and second, 1 1/4 lengths between second and third and a neck between third and fourth.

Submissions for Decision:

The informant Mrs Thornton demonstrated the video films pointing out the outward movement of JERSEY GIRL who shifted into the line of running SNIPPECHEE was entitled to.  Mrs Thornton claimed the interference cost her one length and given the official margin of a nose between first and second she considered her mount was a certainty beaten. 

Mr Walker said JERSEY GIRL had shifted out 2 horse widths taking the line of SNIPPECHEE which caused a chain reaction resulting in interference to the outside horses. 

Mr Grylls, rider of  JERSEY GIRL, admitted he did move out under pressure and hamper SNIPPECHEE.  However SNIPPECHEE had headed him but his horse fought back and he believed Mrs Thornton had every chance to beat him.

Mrs Hillis confirmed the evidence of Mr Grylls.

Mr Oatham, when asked for his assessment of the incident, said it was evident that JERSEY GIRL had moved out when a bare length clear.  He said this caused severe interference to several horses and submitted the protest should be upheld.

Mrs Thornton in summing up, told the committee she was not responsible for contributing to the interference received by SCHRODINGER'S CAT and PINS GIFT.

Reasons for Decision:

The committee carefully considered all evidence and reviewed the video films.  It was clearly evident that JERSEY GIRL had taken the line of SNIPPECHEE when not the required distance clear.  The check to Mrs Thornton was a sharp one and after taking into account the nose margin at the post the Committee is satisfied that if interference had not occurred SNIPPECHEE would have beaten JERSEY GIRL.

JCA Decision Fields (raw)

Dmitry: This section contains all JCA fields migrated from the raw data.

Data from these fields should be mapped appropriately to display amongst the standard fields above; please make note of any values below that are missing in the above standard fields but should be there.

hearingid: 040fc06cff52a5c06d09abd08e831542


informantnumber: 4855


horsename: JERSEY GIRL


hearing_racingtype:


startdate: no date provided


newcharge:


plea:


penaltyrequired:


decisiondate: 30/10/2012


hearing_title: R Tauranga 2 November 2012 - R 1 (instigating a protest)


charge:


facts:

Following race 1 a protest was lodged pursuant to rule 642. The informant Mrs T Thornton alleged that the winner JERSEY GIRL interferred with the chances of her mount, SNIPPECHEE, placed second by the judge. She alleged this interference occurred in the final straight.

The Judges' placings were:

14  JERSEY GIRL  1st

2    SNIPPECHEE   2nd

3    SCHRODINGERS CAT  3rd

6    PINS GIFT   4th

4    TWELVE KINGDOMS  5th

The official margins were a nose between first and second, 1 1/4 lengths between second and third and a neck between third and fourth.


appealdecision:


isappeal:


submissionsfordecision:

The informant Mrs Thornton demonstrated the video films pointing out the outward movement of JERSEY GIRL who shifted into the line of running SNIPPECHEE was entitled to.  Mrs Thornton claimed the interference cost her one length and given the official margin of a nose between first and second she considered her mount was a certainty beaten. 

Mr Walker said JERSEY GIRL had shifted out 2 horse widths taking the line of SNIPPECHEE which caused a chain reaction resulting in interference to the outside horses. 

Mr Grylls, rider of  JERSEY GIRL, admitted he did move out under pressure and hamper SNIPPECHEE.  However SNIPPECHEE had headed him but his horse fought back and he believed Mrs Thornton had every chance to beat him.

Mrs Hillis confirmed the evidence of Mr Grylls.

Mr Oatham, when asked for his assessment of the incident, said it was evident that JERSEY GIRL had moved out when a bare length clear.  He said this caused severe interference to several horses and submitted the protest should be upheld.

Mrs Thornton in summing up, told the committee she was not responsible for contributing to the interference received by SCHRODINGER'S CAT and PINS GIFT.


reasonsfordecision:

The committee carefully considered all evidence and reviewed the video films.  It was clearly evident that JERSEY GIRL had taken the line of SNIPPECHEE when not the required distance clear.  The check to Mrs Thornton was a sharp one and after taking into account the nose margin at the post the Committee is satisfied that if interference had not occurred SNIPPECHEE would have beaten JERSEY GIRL.


Decision:

Accordingly after taking all the above into account we uphold the protest.  Therefore SNIPPECHEE is promoted to first.  Before considering the final result however the committee must refer to the second protest under information no. 4856.


sumissionsforpenalty:


reasonsforpenalty:


penalty:


hearing_type: Protest


Rules: 642


Informant: Mrs T Thornton, rider of SNIPPECHEE


JockeysandTrainer:


Otherperson:


PersonPresent: Mrs V Hillis, trainer of JERSEY GIRL, Mr P Walker, owner of SNIPPECHEE, Mr J Oatham, Stipendiary Steward


Respondent: Mr C Grylls, rider of JERSEY GIRL


StipendSteward:


raceid: 7459880b8b30f425236b700194c27bcd


race_expapproval:


racecancelled: 0


race_noreport: 0


race_emailed1: 0


race_emailed2: 0


race_title: R1


submittochair:


race_expappcomment:


race_km:


race_otherexp:


race_chair:


race_pm1:


race_pm2:


meetid: 6ea3e583ac850b967d1f0d82bd530098


meet_expapproval: approved


meet_noreport: 0


waitingforpublication: 0


meet_emailed1: 0


meet_emailed2: 0


meetdate: 02/11/2012


meet_title: Racing Tauranga - 2 November 2012


meet_expappcomment:


meet_km: [{"Comment": [], "MemberRole": "Chair ", "MemberID": "RSeabrook", "Member": "", "OtherExpenses": "0", "KMs": "150", "Total": "93.0", "kmprice": 93.0, "Approved": "on"}]


meet_otherexp:


tracklocation: racing-tauranga


meet_racingtype: thoroughbred-racing


meet_chair: RSeabrook


meet_pm1: GTankard


meet_pm2: none


name: Racing Tauranga